Difference between revisions of "Homosexual behavior in animals"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(does it look natural to you?)
(merge - these were created on the same day)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{merge|Animal homosexuality}}
 
Apparent '''homosexual behavior in animals''' such as one male mounting another has been used as evidence in the argument that [[homosexuality]] is natural and therefore should be permitted in human beings.<ref>Gay groups argue that if homosexual behavior occurs in animals, it is natural, and therefore the rights of homosexuals should be protected. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/02/07/MNG3N4RAV41.DTL] </ref>
 
Apparent '''homosexual behavior in animals''' such as one male mounting another has been used as evidence in the argument that [[homosexuality]] is natural and therefore should be permitted in human beings.<ref>Gay groups argue that if homosexual behavior occurs in animals, it is natural, and therefore the rights of homosexuals should be protected. [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/02/07/MNG3N4RAV41.DTL] </ref>
 
Counter to this argument is the observation that some animals (like the [[Lion]]) eat their young, although neither supporters or opponents of "[[gay rights]]" have used this as an argument in favor of [[infanticide]] or [[cannibalism]].
 
Counter to this argument is the observation that some animals (like the [[Lion]]) eat their young, although neither supporters or opponents of "[[gay rights]]" have used this as an argument in favor of [[infanticide]] or [[cannibalism]].

Revision as of 12:27, 25 November 2008

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Animal homosexuality. (Discuss)

Apparent homosexual behavior in animals such as one male mounting another has been used as evidence in the argument that homosexuality is natural and therefore should be permitted in human beings.[1] Counter to this argument is the observation that some animals (like the Lion) eat their young, although neither supporters or opponents of "gay rights" have used this as an argument in favor of infanticide or cannibalism.

Notes

  1. Gay groups argue that if homosexual behavior occurs in animals, it is natural, and therefore the rights of homosexuals should be protected. [1]