Difference between revisions of "Is our freedom to consume what we want whenever we want worth the cost (i.e. environmental, social, economic, etc.)?"
From Conservapedia
(It's simple: the more energy a nation produces and consumes, the longer its average lifespan.) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Could you please further explain your stance on this issue? | Could you please further explain your stance on this issue? | ||
| + | |||
| + | : It's simple: the more energy a nation produces and consumes, the longer its average lifespan. Why? Because energy production creates wealth that can then improve health-related facilities like hospitals, and energy use provides comfort.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:39, 16 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:39, May 16, 2010
PLEASE THOROUGHLY EXPLAIN ALL ENTRIES AND IDEAS.
NO
YES
The benefits of energy production and consumption exceed the costs. There is a close correlation between average lifespan and energy use, for example. Are the extra years in life worth the cost? Yes.--Andy Schlafly 15:25, 16 May 2010 (EDT)
Could you please further explain your stance on this issue?
- It's simple: the more energy a nation produces and consumes, the longer its average lifespan. Why? Because energy production creates wealth that can then improve health-related facilities like hospitals, and energy use provides comfort.--Andy Schlafly 15:39, 16 May 2010 (EDT)
