Is our freedom to consume what we want whenever we want worth the cost (i.e. environmental, social, economic, etc.)?

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JimFullerton (Talk | contribs) at 20:27, May 16, 2010. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

PLEASE THOROUGHLY EXPLAIN ALL ENTRIES AND IDEAS.

NO

YES

The benefits of energy production and consumption exceed the costs. There is a close correlation between average lifespan and energy use, for example. Are the extra years in life worth the cost? Yes.--Andy Schlafly 15:25, 16 May 2010 (EDT)

Could you please further explain your stance on this issue?

It's simple: the more energy a nation produces and consumes, the longer its average lifespan. Why? Because energy production creates wealth that can then improve health-related facilities like hospitals, and energy use provides comfort.--Andy Schlafly 15:39, 16 May 2010 (EDT)

Nations with such freedom have less poverty and starvation, so yes, it's certainly worth it. DMorris 16:21, 16 May 2010 (EDT)

POSSIBLY

Correlation does not imply causation. This is, however, a very interesting theory and has given me something to think about. Perhaps more evidence is required? Maybe countries in the Middle East could be closely compared, considering the overall similarities between those countries and the fact that some have oil, while others don't. JimFullerton 16:27, 16 May 2010 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Is_our_freedom_to_consume_what_we_want_whenever_we_want_worth_the_cost_(i.e._environmental,_social,_economic,_etc.)%3F&oldid=778784"