Difference between revisions of "Kavanaugh smear"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Liberal hypocrisy)
(→‎Liberal hypocrisy)
Line 97: Line 97:
 
Sen. Corey Booger, who is mentioned as a prospective 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, has written of his groping a 15-year-old girl who was drunk.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/21/sen-cory-booker-admitted-to-groping-female-friend-at-15/</ref> As of the hearing, the slobbering pervert has served in the Senate for five years.
 
Sen. Corey Booger, who is mentioned as a prospective 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, has written of his groping a 15-year-old girl who was drunk.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/21/sen-cory-booker-admitted-to-groping-female-friend-at-15/</ref> As of the hearing, the slobbering pervert has served in the Senate for five years.
  
−
The Judiciary Committee has been investigating [[Russian collusion]] during this entire session of Congress. In 2018 it was reported that Sen. Dianne Feinstein [[collude]]d with the [[Chinese]] [[Communist]] intelligence service, wittingly or unwittingly, for 20 years. The Committee spent most of 2017 trying to discover who employed [[FusionGPS]]; another Feinstein ex-staffer, [[Dan Jones]], has employed FusionGPS throughout 2017 to promote the Russia collusion myth. Feinstein never informed the Committee they were investigating an ex-staffer or revised herself.
+
The Judiciary Committee has been investigating [[Russian collusion]] during this entire session of Congress. In 2018 it was reported that Sen. Dianne Feinstein [[collude]]d with the [[Chinese]] [[Communist]] intelligence service, wittingly or unwittingly, for 20 years. The Committee spent most of 2017 trying to discover who employed [[FusionGPS]]; another Feinstein ex-staffer, [[Dan Jones]], has employed FusionGPS throughout 2017 to promote the Russia collusion myth. Feinstein never informed the Committee they were investigating her own ex-staffer or recused herself.
  
 
===Doxxing===
 
===Doxxing===

Revision as of 17:20, October 3, 2018

See also: Politics of personal destruction

The Kavanaugh smear of 2018 is an unsubstantiated slander against Judge Brett Kavanaugh made by liberals and anti-originalists upset of the prospect of losing the U.S. Supreme Court for the first time since 1934. In particular, Democrats were hysterical at the possibility of a pro-life majority on the Supreme Court.[1] The smears and left-wing tactics to defeat Kavanaugh could have a very negative long-term impact on U.S. politics.[2]

The strategy was first mapped out in July 2018 by Ricki Seidman, who orchestrated the 1991 Clarence Thomas smear and who advised at least one of Kavanaugh's accusers:
"Over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee."[3]
Like the attack on Justice Thomas, outrageous last-minute personal smears were intended to force extended, controversial, divisive, and unresolved hearings leading up to the 2018 Midterm elections. All of the people making the allegations hired partisan Democrat donors and operatives to help their efforts.[4]

The subsequent allegations were predictable, considering the intense opposition to the nomination by liberals and anti-Trumpers. Rather than being interested in the facts, liberals are trying to destroy the nomination of an originalist jurist even if it means destroying the life of the judge and his family.[5] Democrats have other methods of destroying the nomination if the subsequent unsubstantiated allegations fail to gain traction.[6] So far, Judge Kavanaugh has refused to allow Democrats to succeed in intimidating him into withdrawing his nomination.[7][8] Every witness named by both Blasey Ford and Ramirez has denied any event actually occurred.[9]

Explanation of process

Typically in the nomination process, citizen input is invited by contacting your local congressional Representative's office to voice support or opposition. If the citizen' input appears to carry some weight, a University Professor or member of a civic organization for example, the citizen may be refered to the Senator's office who ultimately votes on confirmation. If the Senator deems the information useful to the Committee vetting process, the Senator may ask for a letter in writing identifying who and what the qualifications are of the person making the statement, and a message to the Committee. These letters then are usually placed into the record en masse under unanimous consent agreements, although some people with personal, relevent knowledge may be called to testify. This citizen involvement typically ranges from enthusiastic support to benign objection.

If the Senator from the home state of the letter writer does not serve on the Committee, the Senator passes along the letter to the Committee. This is a routine process for all positions requiring Senate confirmation. Not all citizen involvement is screened or suppressed on a partisan basis by the Senators. Bi-partisan cooperation is, in fact, more common than most people are willing to admit; a Senator from a solid Blue state for example, may be willing to trade their vote across the isle for federal judges in Red states to gain support for a nominee more favorable to them in their home Blue state.

Occasionally Senators may take interest in a letter, and ask for a sworn statement; a controversial letter may escalate up to a request to testify or subpoena. It is not uncommon at all for partisans to impugn a nominee's character, especially if a personal relationship existed. It was at this step in the Anita Hill, Blasey Ford, and other cases related to Kavanaugh, Democrat staffers illegally leaked the unvetted information, putting public pressure on the letter writer to make sworn statements, and even testify. A person of some stature, a college professor for example (as Anita Hill and Blasey Ford are), then may feel compelled to give questionable or suspect testimony to mitigate damage to their reputation, having no idea at the start of the process they may be thrust into the limelight against their will.

Blasey Ford/Feinstein allegation

The letter sent to Sen. Feinstein by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford.

The first allegation is a claim that Kavanaugh tried to assault Christine Blasey Ford, who would later go on to become a far-left[10] university professor in California. Ford never told anyone about her allegation until soon after The New Yorker published in March 2012 that Kavanaugh was most likely the next nominee if a Republican were to win the upcoming presidential election[11] – other media sources discussed him around the same time.[12] Within a few months, Ford for the first time allegedly told her therapist an attempted assault occurred at a drinking party when she was in high school. The therapist did not include names of the boys in notes from the sessions. The notes are said to allege there were four boys present. However, an anonymous letter to the Washington Post in 2018 said there were only 2 boys present in a room. The following day Blasey Ford identified herself as the accuser.

Several factors[13] point to Ford's allegations against Kavanaugh being false:

  • Despite knowing of the allegations against Judge Kavanaugh for several weeks and having the opportunity to get to the truth during the regular hearings, Senate Democrats stayed silent about them until the last possible moment.[14] Afterward, they refused to hold a fair hearing, opting instead to abandon due process and consider Kavanaugh guilty with no evidence[15] – some of them cited his pro-Constitution judicial philosophy as for why he was supposedly guilty.[16] Many liberals even suggested Kavanaugh and the GOP, in general, were guilty because of being "white men."[17][18] Democrats ignored[19] the numerous threats made against Kavanaugh and his family,[20][21] and some Democrats mocked the threats made against swing-vote Senators.[22] They even considered impeaching Kavanaugh in the event of him being confirmed.[23] Predictably, some mainstream media outlets did not devote any airtime to the large amount of evidence supporting Kavanaugh.[24] Some Democrats fundraised off the allegations.[25][26]
  • Dozens of women who knew Kavanaugh well as early as his time in high schools have attested to him being very respectful toward women.[27] Every alleged witness that Ford named affirmed that the event did not happen or that they had no knowledge of it, including Ford's left-wing friends,[28] and when Ford claimed to have found four "witnesses" to corroborate her allegation, they really only were people that Ford had told of the allegation decades later.[29] Meanwhile, despite Democrats obsessing over the allegations, they defended people useful to their cause such as Bill Clinton,[30] Harvey Weinstein, Cory Booker,[31] and Keith Ellison,[32] as well as taking money from woman-abusers[33] (see also: Left-wing war on women). Real victims of rape, such as Juanita Broaddrick, disputed Ford's account.[34]
  • Despite claiming to want to testify, Ford balked when Senate Republicans actually tried to find a time for her to come, and then she demanded outrageous and unprecedented conditions in order to attend.[35] This was in order to delay any votes on Kavanaugh's confirmation as far into the future as possible.[36] Ford's lawyers also refused to cooperate with the Senate judiciary committee, missed deadlines to respond, and kept asking for more time.[37][38] This was despite the fact that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley was extremely generous in trying to accommodate Ford.[39]
  • Ford hired prominent Democrat operative Ricki Seidman – who worked for Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, and Barack Obama – to advise her after the allegation was made public.[40] Earlier, Seidman publicly stated that she and other Democrats were plotting to destroy Kavanaugh's nomination once it was announced in July 2018.[41] Additionally, two of Ford's attorneys agreed after the allegations became public to headline a fundraiser for Democrat Senator Tammy Baldwin, though they canceled it once their plans became known to the public.[42] One of the main attorneys – Debra Katz, a Democrat donor who defended Bill Clinton and Al Franken[43] – representing Ford publicly made statements opposing President Trump earlier in his term.[44] Ford's attorneys were recommended to her by Dianne Feinstein,[45] and they did a poor job representing her.[46]
  • Ford and Senate Democrats demanded that the FBI investigate her allegations – however, the allegation did not involve a federal crime,[47] was too vague and far into the past for an FBI investigation to be of any value, and Congress traditionally investigates such matters. Sen. Joe Biden explained the usefulness of FBI investigations.[48]
  • Ford and her lawyers refused to reveal who paid for the polygraph test – a notoriously unreliable method of determining whether one is telling the truth – she allegedly took and how it was conducted – essential questions to determine how seriously to take its findings.[49] When she finally released it on September 26, 2018, investigators found several inconsistencies in it – not to mention that polygraph tests do not prove anything.[50][51][52] However, she continued to refuse to hand over her therapist notes to the Judiciary Committee.[53]
  • Ford's yearbooks show that she and her friends willingly supported the promiscuous, drunken, and racist culture at her school.[54]
  • Ford admitted to not knowing many details of the alleged incident, even including how many people were involved.[55] Even after she went public about the allegations, important details of the alleged incident changed.[56]
  • Ford claimed to be afraid of flying because of the alleged incident[57] – giving her an excuse to delay the hearings as she drove from California from Washington, D.C., but she has family on the east coast, and he did graduate work in Hawaii, revealing an inconsistency in her account.[58] When the details of the polygraph test were released it was found it was administered in Maryland, meaning it was likely Ford flew there and back.[50][51] At her Senate hearing, she admitted she did a lot of flying despite her previous claim.[59]
  • Kavanaugh took detailed calendar notes, and his calendar for the summer of 1982 do not describe any party as the one Ford described.[60]
  • The Kavanaugh allegations were first reported on by The Washington Post, a left-wing newspaper which published similar accusations against conservative such as Donald Trump in 2016 and Roy Moore in 2017.
Committee Counsel Rachel Mitchell, who examined Dr. Ford, concluded:
A “he said, she said” case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them.... I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.[61][62]

Feinstein confidentiality and rules violations.

A Feinstein staffer was reported to have leaked the Kavanaugh smear. It wasn't the first scandal involving Feinstein and staffers in the twilight of her career. Feinstein did not recuse herself or report a conflict of interest while the Committee was investigating who employed FusionGPS as an ex-Feinstein staffer took over paying FusionGPS to promote the Trump-Russia smear. Most amazing of all, even the California Democratic Party is fed up with Feinstein's corruption and refused to endorse her for re-election.

Dianne Feinstein, who facilitated publication of the letter and violated a confidentiality agreement with Ford by leaking to the mainstream media, told The Hill, "I don't know if everything is truthful."[63]

Feinstein met for a private interview with Judge Kavanaugh on August 20, knew of Blasey Ford's allegations for three weeks, did not ask Kavanaugh about the allegations, did not inform the committee or ask the FBI to investigate, violated committee rules and process by leaking confidential information,[64][65] and had already recommended an attorney who, as in the Michael Cohen/Stormy Daniels and Perkins Coie/FusionGPS cases, paid for Blasey Ford's polygraph test to mask the identity of the client.[66] While the fake news media ran with stories for a week that Blasey Ford "passed" a polygraph exam, in fact, it was revealed during the hearings the polygraph examiner never asked her about Judge Kavanaugh.[67]

Feinstein's underhanded ploy betrayed Blasey Ford's confidence, forcing her to testify in public against her will,[68] and was largely viewed as payback for Republicans refusing to hold hearings on the Merrick Garland nomination.

Sen. Lindsey Graham called for an investigation into Feinstein's misconduct.[69] According to a reporter from The Federalist, "Feinstein staffer Heather Sawyer leaked Ford’s letter to the media in violation of Senate Rule 29(5)."[70] The rule states, "Any Senator, officer, or employee of the Senate who shall disclose the secret or confidential business or proceedings of the Senate:
If the offending party is a Senator they are to be punished with "expulsion from the body" and "if an officer or employee, to dismissal from the service of the Senate, and to punishment for contempt."

The extraordinary rule violation by Democrats to force extended hearings was not the first violation in the Kavanaugh hearings – Sen. Cory Booker, likewise admitted to violating the rule early in the hearings.[71] In fact, it was a violation of this same rule that forced the extended Anita Hill hearings in 1991, in which former Vice President Joe Biden then and now was accused of racism, despite being nominated by his party to fill the second highest office in the land.[72]

Blasey Ford, like Anita Hill, was a victim of vicious partisan Democrats seeking to stop a Supreme Court nomination. Both signed letters to be inserted into the record by unanimous consent agreements along with dozens of others in opposition, neither really prepared to attest under oath to the garbage they were asked to write by Democrats.

Liberal hypocrisy

Main article: Liberal hypocrisy

Liberal hypocrisy was on display throughout the extended session, but nowhere did it provide more comic relief than in the questioning of Kavanaugh by Sen. Richard Blumenthal. Blumenthal asked if the judge was familiar with the jury instruction, "falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus"—"false on one thing, false on all."[73] Blumenthal had for 15 years claimed to have served in Vietnam, during the Vietnam war, to promote himself and his political career until he was forced in 2010 to admit to the lie. The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 now provides penalties for military imposters.

Blumenthal went on to demean a constituent – naming her by name before a nationally televised audience – as a promiscuous tramp in high school in an effort to attack Kavanaugh.

Sen. Corey Booger, who is mentioned as a prospective 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, has written of his groping a 15-year-old girl who was drunk.[74] As of the hearing, the slobbering pervert has served in the Senate for five years.

The Judiciary Committee has been investigating Russian collusion during this entire session of Congress. In 2018 it was reported that Sen. Dianne Feinstein colluded with the Chinese Communist intelligence service, wittingly or unwittingly, for 20 years. The Committee spent most of 2017 trying to discover who employed FusionGPS; another Feinstein ex-staffer, Dan Jones, has employed FusionGPS throughout 2017 to promote the Russia collusion myth. Feinstein never informed the Committee they were investigating her own ex-staffer or recused herself.

Doxxing

During the hearings, the home addresses and personal phone numbers of Republican Senators were published online from IP addresses originating within the U.S. House of Representatives.[75] The privacy rights violations are suspected to originate from Democratic congressional staffers.[76] The illegal doxxing is said to have originated with the staff of Rep. Maxine Waters.

New Yorker allegation

The mainstream media brought up a second allegation because "Senate Democrats began looking."[77] It was first reported in the New Yorker during the period in which the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed their vote – Judge Kavanaugh also completely denied it. The allegation was brought by a classmate of Kavanaugh at Yale who majored in sociology and psychology and who then worked in the often-liberal field of domestic violence. "After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney,"[78] she claims that at a party in which she herself was drinking, Kavanaugh exposed himself to her.[79] The allegation had several problems, though that did not matter to Democrats, bent on destroying Kavanaugh and originalism in general.[80] The New Yorker wrote:
"The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident...The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party."
The accuser did give the New Yorker six names to support her claim. Six witnesses Deborah Ramirez stated could substantiate her accusation. And when the New Yorker interviewed them, all six said it never happened, 100% of the evidence discovered by the New Yorker refuted the claim, yet the New Yorker still published the article. Not only were the allegations unsubstantiated, but Ramirez's classmates denied the story.[81][82] The New York Times did its own investigation and could not corroborate the story.[83][84] Critics criticized the New Yorker for its poor, low-quality reporting on this allegation,[85][86][87] and they noted that the article actually refuted the allegations.[88]

Ramirez reportedly refused to cooperate with the Senate Judiciary Committee.[89]

Later, NBC News again made false and uncorroborated claims, reporting that Kavanaugh had potentially known about the allegation before it was revealed because he had possibly contacted others to ask them to refute the claim, but it later – and silently – corrected the original article to show that he had actually found out about the allegation early because Ramirez had contacted others.[90]

Beer smear

After Democrats realized the Ford smear was not going anywhere, they tried to paint Judge Kavanaugh as a heavy drinker.[91][92] Several of Kavanaugh's college friends have denied these smears.[93]

In trying to prove that Kavanaugh was a violent drunk, The New York Times wrote a weak story about a police report that Kavanaugh threw ice at someone in a bar in the mid-1980s. Not only did the report show no charges were filed, that someone else threw a glass at the same person, and that Kavanaugh willingly presented himself for questioning, but the NYT article was written by someone who had explicitly announced her public opposition to Kavanaugh.[94][95]

Seventh FBI investigation

Judge Kavanaugh has undergone six FBI background checks during his career in public service.

Sen. Jeff Flake, on behalf of Senate Democrats and as a condition to vote in the affirmative in Committee and on the final confirmation, requested FBI interviews with relevant parties. President Trump ordered an FBI investigation, limited in scope to be completed in one week. Almost immediately, corrupt elements in the FBI, again, began illegal leaking to the Washington Post, as in the Carter Page FISA abuse scandal, to manipulate public opinion and elections.[96]

Other smears

Another allegation reported by NBC News on the eve of the hearing was debunked.[97][98] In this accusation, Republican Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado followed the rules of the Senate and process. Unlike Feinstein, Gardner shared the written allegation with the Committee. Evidence suggests Democrats or staffers then illegally leaked the unsubstantiated allegation to NBC News. Sen. Lindsey Graham noted NBC News was a co-conspirator in the destruction of Kavanaugh.[99]The person who the letter claimed Kavanaugh assaulted refuted the claim before being asked to give a sworn statement to the Committee.[100] The illegal leak will be investigated.

In the Rhode Island case, a frivolous allegation was reported by an alleged witness who made a sworn statement to the Committee, which he later retracted. The accuser was referred for criminal investigation for making false sworn statements to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.[101]

Avenatti brouhaha

See also: Michael Avenatti

Democratic presidential candidate Michael Avenatti all week long before the extra hearing publicly announced that he was in contact with an anonymous accuser who claimed Kavanaugh participated in drug-induced gang rapes. Avenatti promised to bring forward the accuser before the Thursday hearing. The story was repeated by ABC News, CBS News, USA Today and other mainstream outlets.

Avenatti asked the accuser to go on Anderson Cooper 360, but she said she was afraid of men. He then offered the alleged accuser $20,000 for a one-on-one interview with Poppy Harlow of CNN, and finally $75,000.

Eventually, a third accuser made graphic allegations about high school parties that Brett Kavanaugh supposedly attended, but without any specific accusation based on personal knowledge of any wrongdoing against Kavanaugh himself. One enormous flaw in this third allegation: 60 classmates of Kavanaugh have signed a letter saying they have never met this woman who claims she was at all these parties.[102] Many other inconsistencies and credibility issues arose.[103][104] For example, she was revealed to have been in later college years while Kavanaugh was in his early high school years.[105] The New York Times tried but failed to corroborate the allegation.[51] It was soon discovered that the accuser had a troubled past,[106][107] and she had sued one of her employers for "sexual harassment" using Ford's lawyer's firm.[108][109] She was sued in 2000 for making false sexual misconduct allegations.[110][111]

As with the previous allegations, dozens of women rallied to Judge Kavanaugh's defense, with sixty of them signing a letter affirming he had a good character in high school.[112]

Observers noted that "Michael Avenatti managed to make it all about him."[113]

The New York Times did an article of Judge Kavanaugh's high school yearbook, but they did not mention that it was supplied from an outspoken and severely anti-Trump politician from Maryland, and it hid other important facts in the story.[114][115] Avenatti, using his 4chan troll sources, claimed to be able to "decipher" comments in the yearbook.[116]

Later, in an NBC interview, Swetnick contradicted the main points of her accusation, stating this time that she did not actually see Kavanaugh "spike punch" despite originally saying she had a "firm recollection" that he did.[117][118]

Leftist response

Chronicle Herald political cartoon smear

Canadian liberal newspaper The Chronicle Herald, based in Halifax, Nova Scotia, weighed in with its take and opinion on the Kavanaugh confirmation with a slanderous and grossly inaccurate political cartoon in its September 29, 2018 edition that depicted a man attempting to rape Lady Justice, with the Republican Party logo appearing on the man's shirt cuffs.[119][120] The highly inflammatory, provocative and controversial cartoon was intended as an attack against Kavanaugh, the Republicans and men as a whole and was unsurprisingly retweeted by supportive liberal celebrities and other liberal media outlets, but ended up drawing a heavy amount of criticism against it on the newspaper's Twitter account, with commenters taking both the paper and the cartoon's artist, Bruce MacKinnon, to task for MacKinnon's slanderous accusation while he and the paper ignored that the Democrat Party itself, particularly Bill Clinton, has its own sordid history of assaults, sexual and otherwise, against women. One commenter who took issue with the cartoon responded by posting a modified version of the cartoon with the Democrat Party logo on the man's shirt cuffs instead,[121] correctly pointing out that party's history of its mistreatment of women.

Attacks on Kavanaugh children

Far-Left liberal cartoonist Chris Britt viciously attacked Judge Kavanaugh's 10-year-old daughter and her faith in a mocking cartoon which subsequently drew criticism against him on Twitter and Facebook, but also drew vicious, nasty and bigoted attacks against critics of the cartoon from deranged leftists posting in support of Britt.[122]

Death and castration of Republicans

Georgetown Prof. Carol Christine Fair tweeted during the hearings that Republican Senators on the Judiciary Committee,
"All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes."[123]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Multiple references:
  2. ↑ Attkisson, Sharyl (October 1, 2018). Kavanaugh case opens door to dangerous range of accusations. The Hill. Retrieved October 1, 2018.
  3. ↑ Begins at 3:20.
  4. ↑ Pappas, Alex (September 24, 2018). Kavanaugh accusers enlist high-powered lawyers, Dem operatives. Fox News. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  5. ↑ Kraychik, Robert (September 24, 2018). Pat Caddell: For Democrats, ‘Everybody Is Roadkill’ on Path to ‘Beat Kavanaugh’. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  6. ↑ Pollak, Joel B. (September 23, 2018). 5 More Dirty Tricks Democrats Could Still Try to Derail Brett Kavanaugh. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  7. ↑ Pappas, Alex (September 24, 2018). Kavanaugh fires back at latest allegation, says he won’t be ‘intimidated into withdrawing’. Fox News. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  8. ↑ Spiering, Charlie (September 24, 2018). Brett Kavanaugh Defies ‘Grotesque Character Assassination’ from the Left. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  9. ↑ Nolte, John (September 24, 2018). Nolte: Every Witness Named by Kavanaugh’s Accusers Sides with Kavanaugh. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  10. ↑ Binder, John (September 16, 2018). Kavanaugh Accuser Signed Letter Fighting Trump Border Enforcement. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  11. ↑ https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/03/26/holding-court
  12. ↑ Carney, Timothy P. (September 26, 2018). If Christine Blasey Ford named Brett Kavanaugh in 2012, that neither strengthens nor weakens her case. Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  13. ↑ Sperry, Paul (September 25, 2018). Eight big problems for Christine Blasey Ford’s story. New York Post. Retrieved September 29, 2018.
  14. ↑ Klukowski, Ken (September 17, 2018). Senate Judiciary Committee: Suspicious Timing of Feinstein Attack on Kavanaugh. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  15. ↑ Multiple references: Left-wing op-eds supporting this un-American notion: See also:
  16. ↑ Re, Gregg (September 23, 2018). Top Democrat cites Kavanaugh's 'outcome-driven' legal philosophy as reason to deny him due process. Fox News. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  17. ↑ Scarry, Eddie (September 22, 2018). Media convict Brett Kavanaugh and GOP on grounds of being white males. Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  18. ↑ Kavanaugh allegation sends liberal rhetoric over the top. Fox News Video. September 21, 2018. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  19. ↑ Re, Gregg (September 20, 2018). Senate Dems urge FBI to probe threats against Ford; those against Kavanaugh and kin unmentioned. Fox News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  20. ↑ Caplan, Joshua (September 20, 2018). U.S. Marshals Probe Threats Against Kavanaugh Family: ‘F*** YOU AND YOUR RAPIST HUSBAND’. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  21. ↑ Mason, Ian (September 21, 2018). Watch: Close Friend ‘Heartbroken’ over How Kavanaugh Family Has Been Treated. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  22. ↑ Multiple references:
  23. ↑ Shaw, Adam (September 22, 2018). Democrats float more Kavanaugh investigations, impeachment even if he is confirmed. Fox News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  24. ↑ Noyes, Rich (September 19, 2018). CNN Gives Virtually No Air Time to Pro-Kavanaugh Evidence. NewsBusters. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  25. ↑ Bedard, Paul (September 23, 2018). Hirono fundraises off Kavanaugh, ‘he knows he is guilty’. Washington Examiner'. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  26. ↑ Pollak, Joel B. (September 28, 2018). Nancy Pelosi Fundraises off Brett Kavanaugh Hearing. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  27. ↑ Multiple references: See also:
  28. ↑ Multiple references: See also:
  29. ↑ Adams, Becket (September 26, 2018). 4 new witnesses for Christine Blasey Ford don’t really corroborate her claim against Kavanaugh. Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  30. ↑ Richardson, Valerie (September 22, 2018). Dems were okay with putting 'sexual predator/rapist' in White House says Clinton accuser Broaddrick. The Washington Times. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  31. ↑ Berry, Susan (September 22, 2018). Sen. Cory Booker Admitted to ‘Groping’ Female Friend at 15. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  32. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (September 20, 2018). Ellison Accuser: #MeToo Democrats Don’t Believe Me. The New American. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
    See also:
  33. ↑ Mikelionis, Lukas (September 21, 2018). Anti-Kavanaugh voices Hirono, Feinstein took campaign cash from Dem colleague who admitted hitting his wife. Fox News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  34. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (September 19, 2018). Clinton Accuser Broaddrick Doubts Allegation Against Kavanaugh. The New American. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  35. ↑ Multiple references:
  36. ↑ Pollak, Joel B. (September 21, 2018). Pollak: Christine Blasey Ford Wants Thursday Hearing to Stop Brett Kavanaugh from Joining Supreme Court Oct. 1. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  37. ↑ Mason, Ian (September 21, 2018). Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyers Refuse to Meet Grassley’s Final Deadline for Setting Up Monday Vote. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  38. ↑ Moons, Michelle (September 22, 2018). Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyers Proposes Further Negotiation to Accept Testifying Next Week. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  39. ↑ Multiple references:
  40. ↑ Multiple references:
  41. ↑ Hoft, Jim (September 21, 2018). IT WAS ALL A DEMOCRAT PLOT: Christine Ford Adviser Told Democrats in July Call About Plot to Take Down Kavanaugh (AUDIO). The Gateway Pundit. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  42. ↑ Multiple references:
  43. ↑ Starr, Penny (September 18, 2018). Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyer Longtime Dem Donor, Defended Clinton, Franken. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  44. ↑ Athey, Amber (September 21, 2018). Kavanaugh Accuser's Lawyer Caught on Camera: 'We are Going to Resist'. The Daily Caller. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  45. ↑ Mason, Ian (September 27, 2018). Kavanaugh Hearing: Feinstein’s Office Recommended Accuser’s Lawyer. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  46. ↑ Adams, Becket (September 27, 2018). The only people who will come away today looking worse than Brett Kavanaugh are Christine Blasey Ford’s attorneys. Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  47. ↑ Nolte, John (September 18, 2018). FBI: Brett Kavanaugh ‘Allegation Does Not Involve Any Potential Federal Crime’. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  48. ↑ https://youtu.be/vNK1dVIeYWo
  49. ↑ Re, Gregg (September 19, 2018). Polygraph exam taken by Kavanaugh accuser Christine Ford comes under scrutiny. Fox News. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 Re, Gregg (September 26, 2018). Kavanaugh accuser Christine Ford releases results of polygraph test, but key detail appears to contradict past statements. Fox News. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 51.2 Live Updates: Avenatti Circus Throws Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation into Chaos. Breitbart News. September 26, 2018. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  52. ↑ Nolte, John (September 27, 2018). Cracks and Contradictions Found in Christine Blasey Ford Documents. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  53. ↑ https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1045022260346720258
  54. ↑ WHY CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOKS WERE SCRUBBED: Faculty Approved Racism, Binge Drinking and Promiscuity. Cult of the 1st Amendment. September 19, 2018. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  55. ↑ Pappas, Alex (September 19, 2018). Inconsistencies emerge in Kavanaugh accusations, with hearing in doubt. Fox News. Retrieved September 22, 2018.
  56. ↑ Re, Gregg (September 23, 2018). Kavanaugh accuser's details have changed, but she remains certain about abuse. Fox News. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  57. ↑ Payton, Bre (September 21, 2018). Kavanaugh Accuser: Delay Hearing Because I Don’t Like Flying. The Federalist. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  58. ↑ Tucker: Brett Kavanaugh and the midterm elections. Fox News Video. September 24, 2018. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  59. ↑ Pollak, Joel B. (September 27, 2018). Rachel Mitchell Demolishes Christine Blasey Ford’s Claim She Fears Flying. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  60. ↑ Pollak, Joel B. (September 26, 2018). Brett Kavanaugh’s 1982 Calendar Released; Grounded Three Weekends. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  61. ↑ https://twt-media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2018/10/01/09.30.18_Mitchell_Memo.pdf
  62. ↑ Nolte, John (October 1, 2018). Prosecutor’s Senate Report Outlines 9 Reasons Why Christine Blasey Ford Not Credible. Breitbart News. Retrieved October 1, 2018.
  63. ↑ https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/407325-feinstein-on-kavanaugh-accusations-i-dont-know-if-everything-is-truthful
  64. ↑ https://youtu.be/uvUYAuG5szI
  65. ↑ https://youtu.be/5DNcKVMp1Yo
  66. ↑ https://youtu.be/L2rQEg57LOU
  67. ↑ https://www.westernjournal.com/fords-lawyers-just-released-polygraph-report-internet-questions/
  68. ↑ See Blasey Ford testimony transcript; also https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/senator-hatch-letter.jpg
  69. ↑ https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/30/lindsey-graham-judiciary-committee/
  70. ↑ https://www.dailywire.com/news/36228/name-emerges-feinstein-staffer-thought-have-leaked-ryan-saavedra
  71. ↑ https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democrats-threaten-release-confidential-kavanaugh-documents/story?id=57643589
  72. ↑ https://www.essence.com/news/politics/joe-biden-anita-hill-comment-2020-presidential-run/
  73. ↑ https://youtu.be/Ypv8fcRpiSE
  74. ↑ https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/21/sen-cory-booker-admitted-to-groping-female-friend-at-15/
  75. ↑ https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/gop_senators_victims_of_doxxing_.html
  76. ↑ http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/29/rand-paul-senate-doxx-probe/
  77. ↑ Levine, Jon (September 24, 2018). Ronan Farrow Says Second Kavanaugh Accuser Came Forward Because ‘Senate Democrats Began Looking’. The Wrap. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  78. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (September 24, 2018). Second Kavanaugh Accuser Had Help “Remembering” Alleged Incident. The New American. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  79. ↑ https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez
  80. ↑ Adams, Becket (September 23, 2018). New Brett Kavanaugh accusation has a bunch of flaws, but Democrats already using it against him anyway. Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 23, 2018.
  81. ↑ DeMarche, Edmund; Chamberlain, Samuel; Pergram, Chad (September 24, 2018). Kavanaugh buffeted by more uncorroborated charges as Dems seek to derail nomination. Fox News. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  82. ↑ Klukowski, Ken (September 23, 2018). Ramirez’s Yale Classmates Reject Kavanaugh Allegations, White House Stands by Nominee. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  83. ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/23/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-testify.html
  84. ↑ Erickson, Erick (September 24, 2018). New York Times Refused to Run the Latest Kavanaugh Accuser's Story. TheMaven.net. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  85. ↑ Flood, Brian (September 24, 2018). Critics condemn New Yorker over uncorroborated Kavanaugh story: 'Lazy at best, slimy at worst'. Fox News. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  86. ↑ Cooke, Charles C. W. (September 24, 2018). On The New Yorker’s Grossly Irresponsible Story. National Review. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  87. ↑ Kurz, Howard (September 25, 2018). Major problems with New Yorker's second Kavanaugh accuser blunt impact. Fox News. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  88. ↑ Nolte, John (September 24, 2018). Nolte: Ronan Farrow’s New Yorker Piece Debunks Ramirez Allegation Against Kavanaugh. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  89. ↑ Nolte, John (September 25, 2018). Report: Kavanaugh Accuser Ramirez Refuses to Cooperate with Senate Committee. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  90. ↑ https://twitter.com/guypbenson/status/1047119725468246016
  91. ↑ Richardson, Valerie (October 2, 2018). Democrats zero in on Kavanaugh's 'lying,' temperament as sexual assault claims crumble. The Washington Times. Retrieved October 3, 2018.
  92. ↑ York, Byron (September 30, 2018). Byron York: In Kavanaugh fight, Democrats move goalposts far, far away. Washington Examiner. Retrieved October 1, 2018.
  93. ↑ Birnbaum, Emily (October 1, 2018). Ex-Kavanaugh classmates claim he did not drink excessively. The Hill. Retrieved October 1, 2018.
  94. ↑ Adams, Becket (October 2, 2018). New York Times’ dud of a Kavanaugh bombshell co-authored by admitted anti-Kavanaugh partisan. Washington Examiner. Retrieved October 2, 2018.
  95. ↑ Caplan, Joshua (October 2, 2018). NYT Assigns Emily Bazelon to Kavanaugh Coverage After She Declared Opposition to Nomination. Breitbart News. Retrieved October 2, 2018.
  96. ↑ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-reaches-out-to-second-woman-who-has-accused-brett-kavanaugh-of-sexual-misconduct/2018/09/29/365f959c-c3f8-11e8-8f06-009b39c3f6dd_story.html
  97. ↑ https://libertyunyielding.com/2018/09/26/new-fourth-allegation-against-kavanaugh-completely-anonymous-evokes-a-payback-motive/
  98. ↑ Adams, Becket (October 1, 2018). It sure looks like that NBC story about a fourth Kavanaugh accuser is a load of nonsense. Washington Examiner. Retrieved October 1, 2018.
  99. ↑ http://dailycaller.com/2018/10/01/sen-graham-attacks-nbc-news/
  100. ↑ Scarborough, Rowan (September 27, 2018). Kavanaugh's ex-girlfriend refutes mother's anonymous accusations sent to Senate. The Washington Times. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  101. ↑ https://m.theepochtimes.com/grassley-refers-kavanaugh-accuser-for-criminal-investigation_2674699.html
  102. ↑ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/60-classmates-of-kavanaugh-sign-letter-saying-they-have-never-met-creepy-porn-lawyers-client-julie-swetnick/
  103. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (September 27, 2018). Gang-Rape Accuser’s Story Too Fantastic to be True? The New American. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  104. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (September 27, 2018). Avenatti and Client Have Credibility Problems. The New American. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  105. ↑ Pollak, Joel B. (September 26, 2018). Questions About Julie Swetnick’s Claims: She Was in College When Brett Kavanaugh Was in High School. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  106. ↑ Caputo, Marc; Korecki, Natasha (September 26, 2018). Ex-boyfriend filed restraining order against third Kavanaugh accuser. Politico. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  107. ↑ Kunzelman, Michael; Biesecker, Michael; Mendoza, Martha (September 30, 2018). Third Kavanaugh accuser has extensive legal history. The Washington Times (from the Associated Press). Retrieved September 30, 2018.
  108. ↑ Pappas, Alex (September 26, 2018). Republicans stand by Kavanaugh as details on Avenatti's new client emerge. Fox News. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  109. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (September 27, 2018). Gang-rape Accuser Shook Down New York Life, Lawyer Was Debra Katz. The New American. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  110. ↑ Pollak, Joel B. (September 30, 2018). Third Brett Kavanaugh Accuser Was Sued in 2000 for False Allegations of Sexual Misconduct. Breitbart News. Retrieved September 30, 2018.
  111. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (October 1, 2018). Third Kavanaugh Accuser Faced Sexual Harassment Lawsuit, Tried to Shake Down D.C. Metro. The New American. Retrieved October 1, 2018.
  112. ↑ Dedaj, Paulina (September 26, 2018). Kavanaugh backed by 60 who attended Georgetown Prep, sister schools. Fox News. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  113. ↑ Kurz, Howard (September 27, 2018). Avenatti orchestrates coverage while unveiling third Kavanaugh accuser. Fox News. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  114. ↑ Hemingway, Mollie (September 25, 2018). New York Times Hid Multiple Key Facts In Kavanaugh Yearbook Hit. The Federalist. Retrieved September 25, 2018.
  115. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (September 26, 2018). Times’ Yearbook Story Hid Anti-Trump Affiliations of Three Sources. The New York Times. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
  116. ↑ https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-yearbook-michael-avenatti/
  117. ↑ Shaw, Adam (October 2, 2018). Kavanaugh accuser Swetnick faces credibility questions amid changing story, details from past. Fox News. Retrieved October 2, 2018.
  118. ↑ Kirkwood, R. Cort (October 2, 2018). Swetnick: I Didn’t See Kavanaugh Spike Punch; Ex Boyfriend: “I Don’t Believe Her”. The New American. Retrieved October 2, 2018.
  119. ↑ Canadian Paper Publishes Anti-Brett Kavanaugh Cartoon of Republican Man Sexually Assaulting Justice at Bretibart News Network
  120. ↑ Chronicle Herald political cartoon - September 29, 2018 at Twitter
  121. ↑ Modified version by Twitter poster of original Chronicle Herald political cartoon showing Democrat Party member assaulting Lady Justice
  122. ↑ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon
  123. ↑ https://freebeacon.com/politics/georgetown-professor-white-gop-senators-kavanaugh-hearing-deserve-miserable-deaths/amp/
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kavanaugh_smear&oldid=1457968"