Difference between revisions of "Lawfare Group"
(→McCabe defense) |
(→The insurance policy) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were regular readers of the Lawfareblog. On July 28, 2016, three days before Strzok officially opened a [[counterintelligence]] investigation into the Trump campaign, Strzok and Lisa Page had this exchange:<ref>https://www.archive.org/stream/StrzokPageTexts/FBI-texts_djvu.txt</ref> | Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were regular readers of the Lawfareblog. On July 28, 2016, three days before Strzok officially opened a [[counterintelligence]] investigation into the Trump campaign, Strzok and Lisa Page had this exchange:<ref>https://www.archive.org/stream/StrzokPageTexts/FBI-texts_djvu.txt</ref> | ||
| − | + | {{quotebox|Lisa Page: Ha. First line made me smile. ''What [https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-does-us-government-know-about-russia-and-dnc-hack Does the US Government Know About Russia and the DNC Hack?]''}} | |
| − | + | The first line Lisa Page referred to reads, "Potentially unpleasant news for Jim Comey: We need you to intervene in the 2016 election again," three weeks after Comey violated departmental policy and publicly cleared Hillary Clinton of any charges in the [[Clinton email investigation]].<ref>https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-inspector-general-comey-20180614-story.html</ref> | |
| − | The first line Lisa Page referred to reads, "Potentially unpleasant news for Jim Comey: We need you to intervene in the 2016 election again," three weeks after Comey violated departmental policy and publicly cleared Hillary Clinton of any charges in the [[Clinton email investigation]]. | + | {{quotebox|Strzok: Interesting. Good comments about Comey, too. ''Trump and the Powers of the American Presidency, Part III''.<ref>https://www.lawfareblog.com/trump-and-powers-american-presidency-part-iii</ref>}} |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
==Nadler impeachment probe== | ==Nadler impeachment probe== | ||
Revision as of 02:25, September 17, 2019
Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.
During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]
- (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
- (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
- (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
- (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.
After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:
- (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
- (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
- (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
- (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
- (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
- (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
- (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]
Contents
Lawfare Alliance
The Lawfare alliance [4] includes: James Comey, former FBI legal counsel James Baker (DOJ), Comey’s leaking buddie Daniel Richman; former DOJ-NSD lawyer David Laufman (who also represented Monica McLean, Christine Blasey Ford’s FBI bestie and narrative engineer friend), Deputy AG Sally Yates, FBI lead agent Peter Strzok, FBI counsel Lisa Page; Obama administration lawyer Norm Eisen; criminal defense attorney Barry Berke; former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman; Mueller lead Andrew Weissmann and the Mueller team of lawyers, all of them -and more- are connected to the Lawfare group; and this network provides the sounding board for all of the weaponized approaches, including the various new legal theories outlined within the Weissmann-Mueller Report, and a host of current and former FBI and DOJ foot-soldiers.
Fusion GPS is part of the Lawfare network as a distribution hub for research information needed by the journalists who are writing on behalf of the Lawfare need. Ezra Klein’s “Journo-List”; the email group of 400+ reporters for multiple media outlets who collectively collaborated on stories.
The insurance policy
Benjamin Wittes was the first published reference to an "insurance policy" to subvert the Trump presidency, should he win. Wittes published it after Strzok first used the term to explain the reason for FISA abuse to Lisa Page. Wittes wrote,...our democracy needs a health insurance policy. Indeed, it’s not enough to imagine how the Coalition of All Democratic Forces, which I posited last Monday, might respond to a Clinton victory, a subject which I discussed discussed on Tuesday.We need to imagine as well how such a coalition should respond to the unthinkable: What if Trump wins?
...The Coalition of All Democratic Forces should certainly see what kind of use it might make of the legislature, but realistically, we should probably expect that the coalition’s job in Congress will be to prevent Trump from passing anti-democratic legislation. That is, the task in Congress will be a negative one of denying Trump the use of the Article I powers, not the positive one of the coalition’s using them itself. That leaves the tool that will certainly be available: the courts....
If I wake up on November 9 to find that Trump has been elected president, I plan to spend the next two months building such a network....The goal will not be to challenge everything a Trump administration does, some of which will be lawful, after all, and some of which may be debatably lawful among reasonable people."[5]
Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were regular readers of the Lawfareblog. On July 28, 2016, three days before Strzok officially opened a counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign, Strzok and Lisa Page had this exchange:[6]
Lisa Page: Ha. First line made me smile. What Does the US Government Know About Russia and the DNC Hack?
The first line Lisa Page referred to reads, "Potentially unpleasant news for Jim Comey: We need you to intervene in the 2016 election again," three weeks after Comey violated departmental policy and publicly cleared Hillary Clinton of any charges in the Clinton email investigation.[7]
Strzok: Interesting. Good comments about Comey, too. Trump and the Powers of the American Presidency, Part III.[8]
Nadler impeachment probe
After the 2018 Midterm elections, and in preparation for the “impeachment” strategy, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler hired Lawfare Group members to become committee staff.
Chairman Schiff hired former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman (link), and Chairman Nadler hired Obama administration lawyer Norm Eisen and criminal defense attorney Barry Berke, all are within the Lawfare network.[9]
McCabe defense
In September 2019 The Daily Caller's Chuck Ross reported, *Chuck Ross: Andrew McCabe’s Lawyer Wants To Find Out What The Grand Jury Is Up To.[10] McCabe’s defense attorney, Michael Bromwich (also the attorney for Christine Blasey Ford in the Kavanaugh smear hearings), leaked his communication with U.S. Attorney for DC, Jessie Liu, to the New York Times.[11] The purpose of Bromwich's letter to Jessie Liu was to push information gained within the Lawfare network into the media narrative. It was transparently obvious that Lawfare allied lawyers who left the U.S. Attorneys Office in DC were leaking what they know to the Lawfare allied members on former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe’s defense. Bromwich could not directly say he was aware of Grand Jury evidence, because such information would be illegal to acquire. However, current and former DOJ officials leaked to the New York Times and Washington Post, and Bromwich could then cite the reporting on those leaks.
Pushing this information into the public sphere supports the objective of the defense; however, the Lawfare alliance cannot admit how they gained that information -leaks from allies inside the DOJ- because that would be illegal.
Leaks to the NYT and WaPo are how the Lawfare alliance push their narrative. These are the same DOJ/FBI officials who leaked to the same media when constructing the Russia collusion hoax narrative around the 2016 Trump campaign. The same exact people.[12]
See also
References
- ↑ https://www.lawfareblog.com/about-lawfare-brief-history-term-and-site
- ↑ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/15/lawfare-group-begins-delegitimizing-supreme-court/
- ↑ https://t.co/fd7sTncm3Z
- ↑ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/13/mccabes-lawfare-alliance-working-with-media-allies-to-frame-defense/
- ↑ https://www.lawfareblog.com/coalition-all-democratic-forces-part-iii-what-if-trump-wins
- ↑ https://www.archive.org/stream/StrzokPageTexts/FBI-texts_djvu.txt
- ↑ https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-inspector-general-comey-20180614-story.html
- ↑ https://www.lawfareblog.com/trump-and-powers-american-presidency-part-iii
- ↑ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/27/details-emerging-of-coordinated-mueller-testimony-with-congressional-democrats/
- ↑ https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/13/andrew-mccabe-email-grand-jury-indictment/
- ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/13/us/politics/andrew-mccabe-grand-jury.html
- ↑ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/13/mccabes-lawfare-alliance-working-with-media-allies-to-frame-defense/
