Difference between revisions of "Maxwell's Equations"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Maxwell's Equations''', formulated around 1861 by [[James Clerk Maxwell]] describe the interrelation between electric and magnetic fields.<ref>Wile, Dr. Jay L. ''Exploring Creation With Physical Science''. Apologia Educational Ministries, Inc. 1999, 2000</ref>They were a synthesis of what was known about electricity and magnetism, particularly building on the work of [[Michael Faraday]], [[C. A. Coulomb|Charles-Augustin Coulomb]], [[Andre-Marie Ampere]], and others.  These equations predicted the existence of [[Electromagnetic wave]]s, giving them properties that were recognized to be properties of light, leading to the (correct) realization that light is an electromagnetic wave.  Other forms of electromagnetic waves, such as radio waves, were not known at the time, but were subsequently demonstrated by [[Heinrich Hertz]] in 1888.  These equations are considered to be among the most elegant edifices of mathematical physics.
+
''Maxwell's Equations''
  
Maxwell's equations serve many purposes and take many forms. On the one hand, they are used in the solution of actual real-world problems of electromagnetic fields and radiation. On the other hand, they are the subject of admiration for their elegance. There are many T-shirts, typically obtainable on college campuses, sporting various forms of these equations.
+
Maxwell's equations, that he claims describe the nature of electrodynamics are clearly falseAfter all, no one has distinctly witnessed an electric or magnetic field, he just ASSUMES they exist! He's clearly inventing equations to show that these electric and magnetic fields are God or somethingFalse idols, that's all they are, false idolsAs God fearing Conservatives, we cannot allow our minds to be plagued with such nonsense, or I assure you my friends, our spots in Hell will be reserved amongst all the liberal, elitist intellectuals.  We can't have that can we??
 
+
What follows is a survey of the various forms that these equations take, beginning with the most utilitarian and progressing to the most elegant. Which form you prefer depends on your scientific outlook, and perhaps your taste in T-shirts.  The various <math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}</math> and <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{E}</math> symbols appearing in some of the equations are the [[divergence]] and [[curl]] operators, respectively.
+
 
+
They are usually formulated as four equations (but later we will see some particularly elegant versions with only two), and the equations are usually expressed in ''differential form'', that is, as [[Partial Differential Equations]] involving the divergence and curl operatorsThey can also be expressed with integrals.  They are often expressed in terms of four vector fields: E, B, D, and H, though the simpler forms use only E and B.
+
 
+
{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0"
+
! Name
+
! differential form
+
! integral form
+
|-
+
| Coulomb's law of electrostatics, or [[Gauss's Law]]:
+
| <math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \rho</math>   
+
| <math>\oint_S  \mathbf{D} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{A} = \int_V \rho\, \mathrm{d}V</math>
+
|-
+
| Absence of magnetic monopoles:
+
| <math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0</math>   
+
| <math>\oint_S \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{A} = 0</math>
+
|-
+
| Faraday's Law of Induction:
+
| <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}</math>   
+
| <math>\oint_C \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l}  = -  \int_S \frac{\partial\mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \cdot \mathrm{d} \mathbf{A}</math>
+
|-
+
| Ampère's Law, or the Biot-Savart Law, plus displacement current:
+
| <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J} + \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}} {\partial t}</math>
+
| <math>\oint_C \mathbf{H} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = \int_S \mathbf{J} \cdot \mathrm{d} \mathbf{A} +
+
\int_S \frac{\partial\mathbf{D}}{\partial t} \cdot \mathrm{d} \mathbf{A}</math>
+
|}
+
 
+
In these, '''E''' denotes the [[electric field]], '''B''' denotes the [[magnetic field]], '''D''' denotes the ''electric displacement field'', and '''H''' denotes the ''magnetic field strength'' or ''auxiliary field''. '''J''' denotes the free [[current density]], and <math>\rho</math> denotes the free [[electric charge density]].
+
 
+
==Integral Form==
+
The integral forms can be seen to be equivalent to the differential forms through the use of the general [[Stoke%27s Theorem]].  The form known as ''Gauss's Theorem'' (k=3) takes care of the equations involving the divergence, and the form commonly known as just ''Stokes' Theorem'' (k=2) takes care of those involving the curl.
+
 
+
We will say nothing further about the equations in integral form.  The differential versions are the "real" Maxwell equations.
+
 
+
==What the Four Equations mean==
+
===Coulomb's Law===
+
The first equation is just [[C. A. Coulomb|Coulomb]]'s law of electrostatics, manipulated very elegantly (as usual) by [[Michael Faraday|Faraday]] and [[Gauss]].  Coulomb's law simply says that the electric force between two charged particles acts in the direction of the line between them, is repelling if they have like charges and attracting if unlike, is proportional to the product of the charges, and is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them:
+
:<math>F = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \epsilon\ d^2}</math>
+
 
+
In this case, the constant defining the strength of the electric force is <math>4 \pi \epsilon</math> in the denominator.  More about that presently.
+
 
+
In [[International_System_of_Units|SI units]] the charges are measured in [[International_System_of_Units#Coulomb|Coulombs]], the force in [[International_System_of_Units#Newton|Newtons]], the distance in [[International_System_of_Units#Meter|Meters]], and the value of <math>\epsilon</math> is <math>8.854 \times 10^{-12}</math> Coulombs<sup>2</sup> per Newton meter<sup>2</sup>, or [[International_System_of_Units#Farad|Farads]] per meter.
+
 
+
Michael Faraday reformulated the electric and magnetic forces in terms of ''fields''  He said that what was really happening was that each charge was creating an electric field (called E) that acted on the other chargeThe field created by the charge q<sub>1</sub>, as observed at distance d, is
+
:<math>E = \frac{q_1}{4 \pi \epsilon\ d^2}</math>
+
and points directly outward from that charge, in all directions.  The force felt by charge q<sub>2</sub> is
+
:<math>F = q_2 E</math>
+
 
+
Now consider a sphere of radius d with the charge at the center.  If <math>\rho</math> is the charge density in Coulombs per cubic meter (Maxwell's equations are in terms of densities), the total charge in some volume is the integral, over that volume, of <math>\rho</math>.
+
 
+
So we have
+
:<math>q = \int_V \rho\, \mathrm{d}V</math>
+
Now the field at the surface of the sphere is
+
:<math>\frac{q_1}{4 \pi \epsilon\ d^2}</math>, or <math>\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon\ d^2} \int_V \rho\, \mathrm{d}V</math>
+
That field is directly outward, perpendicular to the sphere's surface, and is uniform over the surfaceThe integral of the field over the surface is <math>4 \pi d^2</math> times that (the surface area of the sphere is <math>4 \pi d^2</math>; this is why we have the pesky factor of <math>4 \pi</math> in various formulas; remember that d is the distance, and hence is the sphere's ''radius'', not its diameter), so
+
:<math>\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon}\, \mathrm{d}V = \oint_S  \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{A}</math>
+
But, by Gauss's Theorem,
+
:<math>\oint_S  \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{A} = \int_V \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}\ \mathrm{d}V</math>
+
So
+
:<math>\int_V \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}\ \mathrm{d}V = \int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon}\, \mathrm{d}V</math>
+
Since this is true for any volume, we have
+
:<math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon}</math>
+
Now D = <math>\epsilon\ E</math> in the straightforward case (more about that later), so
+
:<math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \rho</math>
+
===Absence of Magnetic Monopoles===
+
The second of the equations is just like the first, but for the magnetic field.  The divergence of B must be the spatial density of magnetic monopoles.  Since they have never been observed (though various Grand Unified Theories might allow for them), the value is zero.
+
 
+
This wasn't formulated initially in terms of monopoles, but was actually a statement that magnetic "lines of force" (the lines that intuitively describe the field) never end.  They just circulate around various conductors carrying electric current.  In contrast to this, lines of the electric field can be thought to "begin" and "end" on charged particles.
+
===Faraday's Law===
+
The third equation contains the result of Faraday's experiments with "electromagnetic induction"&mdash;a changing magnetic field creates an electric field, and that electric field circulates around the area experiencing the change in total magnetic flux.  (Remember that the curl operator measures the extent to which a vector field runs in circles.) We won't go into the details of his experiments, except to note that he discovered that moving a coil of wire (a loop to pick up a circulating electric field) through a magnetic field (for example, by putting it on a shaft and turning it) led to the invention of electric generators, and hence made a major contribution to the industrialization of the world.  Not bad for a theoretician.
+
 
+
==Other Formulations==
+
In the language of [[Exterior Calculus]], Maxwell's equations can be rewritten much more compactly as:
+
:<math>\mathrm{d}\bold{F}=0</math>
+
:<math>\mathrm{d} * {\bold{F}}=\bold{J}</math>
+
where '''d''' is [[exterior derivative]] operator, '''*''' is the [[Hodge star]] operator, and '''F''' is the Faraday tensor.
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
== References ==
+
<references />
+
 
+
[[Category:Physics]]
+
[[Category:Electrical Engineering]]
+

Revision as of 23:53, October 15, 2008

Maxwell's Equations

Maxwell's equations, that he claims describe the nature of electrodynamics are clearly false. After all, no one has distinctly witnessed an electric or magnetic field, he just ASSUMES they exist! He's clearly inventing equations to show that these electric and magnetic fields are God or something. False idols, that's all they are, false idols. As God fearing Conservatives, we cannot allow our minds to be plagued with such nonsense, or I assure you my friends, our spots in Hell will be reserved amongst all the liberal, elitist intellectuals. We can't have that can we??