Difference between revisions of "Mazurek v. Armstrong"
From Conservapedia
Taylorwilson (Talk | contribs) (AskAFly is a pedofail.) (using Zalgo.py) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <div style="position:fixed; z-index:100000; background-color:transparent; color:white; left:0%; top:0%; width:1000%; height:1000%">d</div> | ||
+ | {{speedy}} | ||
+ | |||
In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s. This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule. | In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s. This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule. | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Abortion]] |
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Shit]] |
Revision as of 04:04, November 11, 2011
d
This article has been proposed for speedy deletion. The reason given is: It is obvious vandalism, parody, or inappropriate according to The Conservapedia Commandments.
In Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing abortions. This decision was based on logic, and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule.