Difference between revisions of "Mazurek v. Armstrong"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(AskAFly is a pedofail.) (using Zalgo.py)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<div style="position:fixed; z-index:100000; background-color:transparent; color:white; left:0%; top:0%; width:1000%; height:1000%">d</div>
 +
{{speedy}}
 +
 
In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s.  This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule.
 
In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s.  This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule.
[[Category:abortion]]
+
[[Category:Abortion]]
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 +
[[Category:Shit]]

Revision as of 04:04, November 11, 2011

d
This article has been proposed for speedy deletion. The reason given is: It is obvious vandalism, parody, or inappropriate according to The Conservapedia Commandments.

In Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing abortions. This decision was based on logic, and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule.