Mystery:Why Do Atheists Dislike Underdogs?

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JohnSpheniscidae (Talk | contribs) at 02:22, February 7, 2012. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

In Britain, where atheism dominates[Citation Needed], people dislike underdogs[Citation Needed] and tend to root for the contestant who is favored to win[Citation Needed]. The opposite is true in the Christian United States, where the underdogs have traditionally been the favorites of the people.

However, as the liberal media in the United States becomes increasingly atheistic, victories by underdogs are increasingly met with dismay or disapproval.

The failure by atheists to build hospitals illustrates their tendencies not to help the weak. The underdog epitomizes the weaker side in a contest, and atheists are fine with the underdog losing.

Why do atheists dislike underdogs?

Belief in Survival of the Fittest

Atheists are fervent believers in "survival of the fittest," and this implies that the underdog will lose and should lose.

Clinging to a Belief Against Surprises

The belief system of an atheist clings a denial that there will be any surprises like Hell. Victory by an underdog is an unexpected surprise, which is unsettling for atheists who insist that there must not be any big surprises in an afterlife.

Optimized for an audience IQ of perhaps 105

Atheism is optimized for an audience having an IQ only slightly above average, perhaps 105. That audience can be more easily persuaded by predictions that always side with the favored contestant, not realizing that errors can occur when they count most (like predictions against the existence of Hell).

Atheism Is About Control

One obvious reason is that atheism is about control. Stalin, a famous atheist in the 20th century, probably did not like underdogs. Underdogs threaten the status quo and the worldview of atheists. Upset victories are unsettling to people like Stalin.