Difference between revisions of "Pacific Gas and Electric v. Public Utility Commission"
From Conservapedia
m (bold) |
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In '''''Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal.''''', 475 U.S. 1, 20-21 (1986) a plurality of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that a state agency cannot cannot require a utility company to include a third-party newsletter in its billing envelope. Justice [[Thurgood Marshall]] concurred. | In '''''Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal.''''', 475 U.S. 1, 20-21 (1986) a plurality of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that a state agency cannot cannot require a utility company to include a third-party newsletter in its billing envelope. Justice [[Thurgood Marshall]] concurred. | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:First Amendment]] |
Latest revision as of 06:57, June 27, 2016
In Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal., 475 U.S. 1, 20-21 (1986) a plurality of the U.S. Supreme Court held that a state agency cannot cannot require a utility company to include a third-party newsletter in its billing envelope. Justice Thurgood Marshall concurred.
