Pacific Gas and Electric v. Public Utility Commission

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) at 19:24, 16 September 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

In Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal., 475 U.S. 1, 20-21 (1986) a plurality of the U.S. Supreme Court held that a state agency cannot cannot require a utility company to include a third-party newsletter in its billing envelope. Justice Thurgood Marshall concurred.