Difference between revisions of "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"
From Conservapedia
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The '''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences''' (usually simply referred to as '''PNAS''') is a scientific journal established by the [[National Academy of Sciences]] in 1914. | + | The '''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences''' (usually simply referred to as '''PNAS''') is a "scientific" journal established by the [[National Academy of Sciences]] in 1914. |
Articles published in the journal are subjected to peer review. However, the sometimes short length of said review has recently sparked criticism from Conservapedia.<ref>See for example [[Flaws in Richard Lenski Study]]</ref> PNAS has further been accused of ideological [[censorship,]] refusing to publish studies and other materials that challenge scientific orthodoxy.<ref>[[PNAS Response to Letter]]</ref> | Articles published in the journal are subjected to peer review. However, the sometimes short length of said review has recently sparked criticism from Conservapedia.<ref>See for example [[Flaws in Richard Lenski Study]]</ref> PNAS has further been accused of ideological [[censorship,]] refusing to publish studies and other materials that challenge scientific orthodoxy.<ref>[[PNAS Response to Letter]]</ref> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Deceit]] | [[Category:Deceit]] | ||
[[Category:Liberal Magazines]] | [[Category:Liberal Magazines]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Liberal Propaganda]] | ||
Revision as of 14:12, June 13, 2019
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (usually simply referred to as PNAS) is a "scientific" journal established by the National Academy of Sciences in 1914.
Articles published in the journal are subjected to peer review. However, the sometimes short length of said review has recently sparked criticism from Conservapedia.[1] PNAS has further been accused of ideological censorship, refusing to publish studies and other materials that challenge scientific orthodoxy.[2]
In 2008, PNAS published a paper that supports the infamous and debunked "hockey-stick" theory of climate change.[3]
References
- ↑ See for example Flaws in Richard Lenski Study
- ↑ PNAS Response to Letter
- ↑ http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/182.page
