Difference between revisions of "Reviewer"
From Conservapedia
(creation) |
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A '''reviewer''' is someone who [[analyze]]s and [[judge]]s a work of [[art]] or [[entertainment]] and presents | + | A '''reviewer''' is someone who [[analyze]]s and [[judge]]s a work of [[art]] or [[entertainment]] and presents his opinions to his [[audience]] via print or electronic media. |
| − | A | + | A good reviewer can help potential consumers tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not. |
| − | Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about | + | Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about the work's creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Art]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:15, 11 July 2016
A reviewer is someone who analyzes and judges a work of art or entertainment and presents his opinions to his audience via print or electronic media.
A good reviewer can help potential consumers tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not.
Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about the work's creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own.
