Difference between revisions of "Reviewer"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(creation)
 
(categorize)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A '''reviewer''' is someone who [[analyze]]s and [[judge]]s a work of [[art]] or [[entertainment]] and presents their opinions to their [[audience]] via print, television, or the internet.
 
A '''reviewer''' is someone who [[analyze]]s and [[judge]]s a work of [[art]] or [[entertainment]] and presents their opinions to their [[audience]] via print, television, or the internet.
  
A talented reveiwer can help the potential consumer tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not.
+
A talented reviewer can help the potential consumer tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not.
  
 
Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about its creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own.
 
Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about its creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own.
 +
 +
[[category:art]]

Revision as of 15:33, 30 July 2007

A reviewer is someone who analyzes and judges a work of art or entertainment and presents their opinions to their audience via print, television, or the internet.

A talented reviewer can help the potential consumer tell whether they would enjoy the work or not regardless of whether the reviewer liked it or not.

Reviewers sometimes include a great deal of background information about the subject involved, or biographical information about its creator, making some kinds of reviews an art form of their own.