Difference between revisions of "Rhodes v. Chapman"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (bold)
Line 1: Line 1:
In '''''Rhodes v. Chapman''''', 452 U.S. 337, 349 (1981), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that the [[U.S. Constitution]] "does not mandate comfortable prisons" and that deference to the legislature was appropriate in the absence of infliction of needless pain or other [[Eighth Amendment]] violations. 
+
Madre de Dios! Es el Pollo Diablo!
  
Generally prison officials may not use excessive physical force against prisoners. See ''[[Hudson v. McMillian]]'', 503 U.S. 1 (1992). Moreover, prison officials must ensure that inmates receive adequate food, clothing, shelter, and medical care, and must "take reasonable measures to guarantee the safety of the inmates." ''Hudson v. Palmer'', 468 U.S. 517, 526-527 (1984).
+
!Sí He dejado en libertad los prisioneros y ahora vengo por ti!
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
[[category:Eighth Amendment]]
+

Revision as of 07:52, 12 August 2010

Madre de Dios! Es el Pollo Diablo!

!Sí He dejado en libertad los prisioneros y ahora vengo por ti!