S. Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) at 20:09, January 16, 2022. It may differ significantly from current revision.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

In S. Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom, 141 S. Ct. 716 (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court enjoined a California rule that prohibited attendance at church services while allowing attendance at other activities, during the coronavirus pandemic.

As Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in concurrence:

No doubt, California will argue on remand, as it has before, that its prohibitions are merely temporary because vaccinations are underway. But the State’s “temporary” ban on indoor worship has been in place since August 2020, and applied routinely since March. California no longer asks its movie studios, malls, and manicurists to wait. And one could be forgiven for doubting its asserted timeline. Government actors have been moving the goalposts on pandemic-related sacrifices for months, adopting new benchmarks that always seem to put restoration of liberty just around the corner. As this crisis enters its second year—and hovers over a second Lent, a second Passover, and a second Ramadan—it is too late for the State to defend extreme measures with claims of temporary exigency, if it ever could. Drafting narrowly tailored regulations can be difficult. But if Hollywood may host a studio audience or film a singing competition while not a single soul may enter California’s churches, synagogues, and mosques, something has gone seriously awry.

S. Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom, 141 S. Ct. 716, 720 (2021).