Difference between revisions of "Score capturing"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (recat, bold)
m (top: clean up)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time '''score capturing''' system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [http://smalltalk.org/smalltalk/TheEarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk_IV.html]
 
"Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time '''score capturing''' system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [http://smalltalk.org/smalltalk/TheEarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk_IV.html]
  
[[Category: music]]
+
[[Category:Music]]
[[Category: computer Programming]]
+
[[Category:Computer Programming]]

Latest revision as of 15:05, June 23, 2016

"Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time score capturing system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [1]