Difference between revisions of "Score capturing"
From Conservapedia
(OPUS, the first real-time score capturing system) |
m (recat, bold) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time score capturing system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [http://smalltalk.org/smalltalk/TheEarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk_IV.html] | + | "Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time '''score capturing''' system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [http://smalltalk.org/smalltalk/TheEarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk_IV.html] |
[[Category: music]] | [[Category: music]] | ||
| − | [[Category: computer | + | [[Category: computer Programming]] |
Revision as of 23:21, August 13, 2012
"Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time score capturing system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [1]
