Difference between revisions of "Secular"
From Conservapedia
m (→History of Secularism: grammar) |
(adding) |
||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The term '''secular''' is | + | The term '''secular''' means non-religious. Officially, it is defined as "worldly" rather than "ecclesiastical" or church-based. The connotations of the term have changed over time.<ref>Its original definition preserved its Latin meaning - "of an age" - as evinced in the ''Secular Games'', or the ''Carmen Secularae'' ("Song of the Augustan Age") by Horace.</ref> Today the term has a positive connotation among non-believers in [[God]], but a negative connotation among those who have [[faith]]. |
| − | The term | + | The term "secular" can be used as a [[euphemism]] for [[atheists]], to avoid negative connotations associated with atheism. Atheism actually isn't secular (common mistake) because in a secular society everyone is considered to be legally equal no matter what they believe in or don't believe in. Atheism is a religious point of view that God(s) do not exist and is therefore not all inclusive. |
The United States was founded as a secular [[republic]], where religious freedom is affirmed in the Constitution and where no special religion is established. However, 'secular' here is ''not'' a synonym for 'atheistic' as secular society includes both Atheists and believers. Moreover, it is impossible to fully separate a legislative or educations system from moral beliefs and its sources, and the Bible overall was the primary foundational single source for America's principles and precepts. | The United States was founded as a secular [[republic]], where religious freedom is affirmed in the Constitution and where no special religion is established. However, 'secular' here is ''not'' a synonym for 'atheistic' as secular society includes both Atheists and believers. Moreover, it is impossible to fully separate a legislative or educations system from moral beliefs and its sources, and the Bible overall was the primary foundational single source for America's principles and precepts. | ||
| − | Hunter Baker in ''The End of Secularism'', distinguishes between pluralism and secularism, and argues that while the latter has rejected religious foundations of traditional morality, yet secularism itself is an ideology based upon certain philosophical foundations, with its own presuppositions. Rather than being the impartial referee it is promoted to be, when this becomes the orthodox ideology of a nation, it works toward censoring that which opposes it, stifling religious life and discourse. | + | Hunter Baker in ''The End of Secularism'', distinguishes between [[pluralism]] and secularism, and argues that while the latter has rejected religious foundations of traditional morality, yet secularism itself is an ideology based upon certain philosophical foundations, with its own presuppositions. Rather than being the impartial referee it is promoted to be, when this becomes the orthodox ideology of a nation, it works toward censoring that which opposes it, stifling religious life and discourse. |
| − | == | + | == Secularism is exhausted and unconfident == |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ''See also:'' [[Decline of the atheist movement]] | |
| − | + | [[File:Jacques Berlinerblau.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|In 2011, atheist [[Jacques Berlinerblau]] declared: "The Golden Age of [[Secularism]] has passed."<ref>Berlinerblau, Jacques (February 4, 2011). [http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/obama-at-the-national-prayer-breakfast-raging-christ-fest-secular-wake/31816 "Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast"]. The Chronicle of Higher Education/Brainstorm blog. Retrieved on May 29, 2015.</ref>]] | |
| − | + | [[Eric Kaufmann]], an [[agnosticism|agnostic]] professor whose academic research specialty is how demographic changes affect religion/irreligion and politics, wrote in 2010: | |
| + | {{cquote|Worldwide, the march of religion can probably only be reversed by a renewed, self-aware secularism. Today, it appears exhausted and lacking in confidence... Secularism's greatest triumphs owe less to science than to popular social movements like nationalism, [[socialism]] and 1960s anarchist-[[liberalism]]. Ironically, secularism's demographic deficit means that it will probably only succeed in the twenty-first century if it can create a secular form of 'religious' enthusiasm.<ref>[http://www.sneps.net/uploadsepk/JQR%20Demography.pdf Shall the religious inherit the earth? - Eric Kaufmann]</ref>}} | ||
| − | + | In recent years, a number of notable atheists have expressed pessimism about the future of the [[atheist movement]] (see: [[Decline of the atheist movement]]). | |
| − | + | == Secular state == | |
| + | |||
| + | ''See also:'' [[Secular state]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | A [[secular state]] is an idea related to secularism, where a state purports to be neutral in matters of religion, supporting neither religion nor irreligion. Most purported secular states teach irreligious [[evolutionism]] that employs [[methodological naturalism]] so they are not neutral when it comes to religion/irreligion (see: [[Evolutionary indoctrination]] and [[Atheist indoctrination]]). | ||
| + | |||
| + | In 2018, ''The Week'' reported: | ||
| + | {{Cquote|Not only has [[secularism]] failed to continue its steady global march but countries as varied as [[Iran]], [[India]], [[Israel]], [[Algeria]], and [[Turkey]] have either had their secular governments replaced by religious ones, or have seen the rise of influential religious nationalist movements. [[Secularization thesis|Secularization, as predicted by the social sciences]], has failed.... | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Religion]] is not going away any time soon, and science will not destroy it. If anything, it is science that is subject to increasing threats to its authority and social legitimacy.<ref>[http://theweek.com/articles/723456/sorry-scientists-religion-here-stay Sorry, scientists. Religion is here to stay.] by Peter Harrison, The ''Week'', September 12, 2017</ref>}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Constitution of [[Bangladesh]] has been amended to make [[Islam]] the state religion.<ref>[https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/culture/raised-voice-secularism-threat ‘I raised my voice because secularism was under threat’]</ref> | ||
==History of Secularism== | ==History of Secularism== | ||
| − | The derivation of an ethical code from purely secular "worldly" concerns begins in Ancient Greece with the philosophical study of nature. The Hebrew term for ''nature'' is not found in the Bible.<ref>{{cite book|url= | + | |
| + | The derivation of an ethical code from purely secular "worldly" concerns begins in Ancient Greece with the philosophical study of nature. The Hebrew term for ''nature'' is not found in the Bible.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LT1V8Xgz1EUC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=hebrew&f=false|author=Leo Strauss|title=Natural Right and History|pate=80}}</ref> Hence, natural law, natural justice, and natural rights are Hellenic in origin. Greek and Roman philosophers, while not atheists, nevertheless built their ethnical philosophy from natural considerations. | ||
Christian theologians differed on their assessment of secular thought. [[Tertullian]] asks "What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?" On the other hand, [[Thomas Aquinas]] championed secular thought and provocatively starts the [[Summa Theologica]] with the question: "Whether, besides philosophy, any further doctrine is required?"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1001.htm|title=Summa Theologica|author=Thomas Aquinas}}</ref> After Aquinas, a harmony between secular thought and religion was the rule until the 19th century. The notion of secularism being inherently anti-religious becomes the norm after the [[French Revolution]]. | Christian theologians differed on their assessment of secular thought. [[Tertullian]] asks "What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?" On the other hand, [[Thomas Aquinas]] championed secular thought and provocatively starts the [[Summa Theologica]] with the question: "Whether, besides philosophy, any further doctrine is required?"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1001.htm|title=Summa Theologica|author=Thomas Aquinas}}</ref> After Aquinas, a harmony between secular thought and religion was the rule until the 19th century. The notion of secularism being inherently anti-religious becomes the norm after the [[French Revolution]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It was made famous by British Writer [[George Jacob Holyoake]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Atheism, secularism and their bland and uninspiring nature == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism and inspiration]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Atheism, secularism and their bland and uninspiring nature]] | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
* Emmet Kennedy, "The Tangled History of Secularism," ''Modern Age'' (Winter 2000) Volume 42, Number 1; [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/42_01/kennedy.pdf online edition] | * Emmet Kennedy, "The Tangled History of Secularism," ''Modern Age'' (Winter 2000) Volume 42, Number 1; [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/42_01/kennedy.pdf online edition] | ||
| − | * [ | + | * [https://books.google.com/books?id=FyAF86k-EV0C&dq=Hunter+Baker+in+The+End+of+Secularism,&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=A8mcvr9B5N&sig=C31Mrmu3gGtkLqHw5ZH_jOly6yA&hl=en&ei=TXooS6P5OpXdlAeZv6ycDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CBYQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=&f=false Hunter Baker, ''The End of Secularism'' ] |
| − | + | ||
| + | ==External Links== | ||
| + | * [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_fMPxIN2UA David Barton Destroys the 'America Is a Secular Nation' Myth | Louder with Crowder] on [[YouTube]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == See also == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Secularization thesis]] | ||
| + | *[[Secular Talk]] | ||
| + | *[[Specious reasoning]] | ||
| + | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Religion and Politics]] | [[Category:Religion and Politics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 00:04, December 13, 2020
The term secular means non-religious. Officially, it is defined as "worldly" rather than "ecclesiastical" or church-based. The connotations of the term have changed over time.[1] Today the term has a positive connotation among non-believers in God, but a negative connotation among those who have faith.
The term "secular" can be used as a euphemism for atheists, to avoid negative connotations associated with atheism. Atheism actually isn't secular (common mistake) because in a secular society everyone is considered to be legally equal no matter what they believe in or don't believe in. Atheism is a religious point of view that God(s) do not exist and is therefore not all inclusive.
The United States was founded as a secular republic, where religious freedom is affirmed in the Constitution and where no special religion is established. However, 'secular' here is not a synonym for 'atheistic' as secular society includes both Atheists and believers. Moreover, it is impossible to fully separate a legislative or educations system from moral beliefs and its sources, and the Bible overall was the primary foundational single source for America's principles and precepts.
Hunter Baker in The End of Secularism, distinguishes between pluralism and secularism, and argues that while the latter has rejected religious foundations of traditional morality, yet secularism itself is an ideology based upon certain philosophical foundations, with its own presuppositions. Rather than being the impartial referee it is promoted to be, when this becomes the orthodox ideology of a nation, it works toward censoring that which opposes it, stifling religious life and discourse.
Contents
Secularism is exhausted and unconfident
See also: Decline of the atheist movement
Eric Kaufmann, an agnostic professor whose academic research specialty is how demographic changes affect religion/irreligion and politics, wrote in 2010:
| “ | Worldwide, the march of religion can probably only be reversed by a renewed, self-aware secularism. Today, it appears exhausted and lacking in confidence... Secularism's greatest triumphs owe less to science than to popular social movements like nationalism, socialism and 1960s anarchist-liberalism. Ironically, secularism's demographic deficit means that it will probably only succeed in the twenty-first century if it can create a secular form of 'religious' enthusiasm.[3] | ” |
In recent years, a number of notable atheists have expressed pessimism about the future of the atheist movement (see: Decline of the atheist movement).
Secular state
See also: Secular state
A secular state is an idea related to secularism, where a state purports to be neutral in matters of religion, supporting neither religion nor irreligion. Most purported secular states teach irreligious evolutionism that employs methodological naturalism so they are not neutral when it comes to religion/irreligion (see: Evolutionary indoctrination and Atheist indoctrination).
In 2018, The Week reported:
| “ | Not only has secularism failed to continue its steady global march but countries as varied as Iran, India, Israel, Algeria, and Turkey have either had their secular governments replaced by religious ones, or have seen the rise of influential religious nationalist movements. Secularization, as predicted by the social sciences, has failed....
Religion is not going away any time soon, and science will not destroy it. If anything, it is science that is subject to increasing threats to its authority and social legitimacy.[4] |
” |
The Constitution of Bangladesh has been amended to make Islam the state religion.[5]
History of Secularism
The derivation of an ethical code from purely secular "worldly" concerns begins in Ancient Greece with the philosophical study of nature. The Hebrew term for nature is not found in the Bible.[6] Hence, natural law, natural justice, and natural rights are Hellenic in origin. Greek and Roman philosophers, while not atheists, nevertheless built their ethnical philosophy from natural considerations.
Christian theologians differed on their assessment of secular thought. Tertullian asks "What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?" On the other hand, Thomas Aquinas championed secular thought and provocatively starts the Summa Theologica with the question: "Whether, besides philosophy, any further doctrine is required?"[7] After Aquinas, a harmony between secular thought and religion was the rule until the 19th century. The notion of secularism being inherently anti-religious becomes the norm after the French Revolution.
It was made famous by British Writer George Jacob Holyoake
Atheism, secularism and their bland and uninspiring nature
Further reading
- Emmet Kennedy, "The Tangled History of Secularism," Modern Age (Winter 2000) Volume 42, Number 1; online edition
- Hunter Baker, The End of Secularism
External Links
See also
References
- ↑ Its original definition preserved its Latin meaning - "of an age" - as evinced in the Secular Games, or the Carmen Secularae ("Song of the Augustan Age") by Horace.
- ↑ Berlinerblau, Jacques (February 4, 2011). "Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast". The Chronicle of Higher Education/Brainstorm blog. Retrieved on May 29, 2015.
- ↑ Shall the religious inherit the earth? - Eric Kaufmann
- ↑ Sorry, scientists. Religion is here to stay. by Peter Harrison, The Week, September 12, 2017
- ↑ ‘I raised my voice because secularism was under threat’
- ↑ Leo Strauss. Natural Right and History.
- ↑ Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica.
