Haha, give me some credit, I did manage to reword some of it ;-)
mthis is nearly word for word from the source, but there's nothing else to this article, so I don't know what to do
+38
no edit summary
m+6
on second thought, merge might be best?
-21
rename request
m+39
no edit summary
mcapitalize?
mRevisionist
+80
no edit summary
+266
Redirecting to Nazgûl
mfix double redirect
fix double redirect
fix double redirect
fix double redirect
Where is your proof?
+205
Where is your proof?
+130
Where is your proof?
+123
Undo revision 597466 by RobertJK (Talk)
+28
fix double redirect
m+1
Many broken redirects! User:Conservative, please fix
-10
Added info: new section
+333
Undo revision 594961 by CarlThomas (Talk)
-27,469
Undo revision 594958 by CarlThomas (Talk)
-50,745
Undo revision 594959 by CarlThomas (Talk)
-15,599
Undo revision 594960 by CarlThomas (Talk)
-9,432
Undo revision 594962 by CarlThomas (Talk)
+9,381
Using "Digg" as a noun
undo - this should get it all
mPhelps and the politics: don't know what happened here. Fixed now?
-49
"result... is to conceal" is grammatically incorrect. It could be "the goal is to conceal" or "the result is the concealing [or concealment] of"
+9
redirect
mfix broken redirect
m-1
Image
+93
Anti-elitist: fix link I ran into wiith CBI page
+9
a simple article to fix a broken redirect. Hopefully someone who knows anything about the topic will come along and improve this
fix broken redirect
-9
fix broken redirect
-9
The Adulteress Story, beginning of John 8: is this what was meant?
+1
a new kettle o' fish
+228
cleaning refs
+194
no edit summary
+152
This is the only reference I can find saying this, and I don't think it's accurate anymore
+63
I'm not removing anything. I'm correcting your grammar.
-1
no edit summary
m-1