Difference between revisions of "Sudden Jihad Syndrome"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Off-topic and already covered in Examples of Bias in Wikipedia. This is not "What Wikipedia wrote or didn't write about subject x"-pedia.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{merge|Jihad}}
 
 
'''Sudden Jihad Syndrome''' is a term [[Daniel Pipes]] coined to describe [[Muslims]] that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against  others and engage in acts of terror.<ref>"...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080]</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all [[Islamist]]s must be considered potential terrorists.<ref> "Individual [[Islamist]]s may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html]</ref>
 
'''Sudden Jihad Syndrome''' is a term [[Daniel Pipes]] coined to describe [[Muslims]] that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against  others and engage in acts of terror.<ref>"...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29080]</ref> Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all [[Islamist]]s must be considered potential terrorists.<ref> "Individual [[Islamist]]s may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html]</ref>
  

Revision as of 19:16, January 6, 2009

Sudden Jihad Syndrome is a term Daniel Pipes coined to describe Muslims that suddenly or unexpectedly turn against others and engage in acts of terror.[1] Pipes has argued that due to this phenomenon all Islamists must be considered potential terrorists.[2]

Examples include:

References

  1. "...a widespread pattern of Muslims who lead quiet lives before turning to terrorism" [1]
  2. "Individual Islamists may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers." [2]
  3. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/10/24/muhammad.profile/index.html
  4. http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/12/01/sprj.dcsp.malvo.trial/index.html
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 http://www.montanasnews.com/articles.php?mode=view&id=7227
  6. http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/02-97/02-25-97/a05wn036.htm
  7. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={730A921C-1FED-4DCD-9949-D28A3390317D}
  8. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/17/AR2006061700725.html
  9. 9.0 9.1 http://www.meforum.org/article/77