Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (→Richard Dawkins and anger) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Richard Dawkins and anger== | ==Richard Dawkins and anger== | ||
Just a suggestion, but should the article [[Richard Dawkins and anger]] be merged with this one? [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT) | Just a suggestion, but should the article [[Richard Dawkins and anger]] be merged with this one? [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT) | ||
| − | : | + | :These are two separate issues. As can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=richard+dawkins+and+anger&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS771US771&oq=richard+dawkins+and+anger&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2.6014j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 HERE], Richard Dawkins has a reputation for being an angry man. He also has a reputation for being abrasive - especially when it comes to matters of religion/irreligion.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:35, 9 May 2019 (EDT) |
| + | |||
| + | :Also, it is not worth the trouble to fool around with merging the articles. He is far, far less influential post [[Elevatorgate]] (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]). In addition, numerous atheists have indicated the [[atheist movement]] is dead/dying and most people consider the [[New Atheism]] movement to be dead/dying (see: [[Decline of the atheist movement]] and [[Decline of militant atheism in the West]]).[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:48, May 9, 2019
Richard Dawkins and anger
Just a suggestion, but should the article Richard Dawkins and anger be merged with this one? Carltonio (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
- These are two separate issues. As can be seen HERE, Richard Dawkins has a reputation for being an angry man. He also has a reputation for being abrasive - especially when it comes to matters of religion/irreligion.Conservative (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
- Also, it is not worth the trouble to fool around with merging the articles. He is far, far less influential post Elevatorgate (see: Richard Dawkins' loss of influence). In addition, numerous atheists have indicated the atheist movement is dead/dying and most people consider the New Atheism movement to be dead/dying (see: Decline of the atheist movement and Decline of militant atheism in the West).Conservative (talk) 13:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
