Talk:Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Richard Dawkins and anger

Just a suggestion, but should the article Richard Dawkins and anger be merged with this one? Carltonio (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT)

These are two separate issues. As can be seen HERE, Richard Dawkins has a reputation for being an angry man. He also has a reputation for being abrasive - especially when it comes to matters of religion/irreligion.Conservative (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
Also, it is not worth the trouble to fool around with merging the articles. He is far, far less influential post Elevatorgate (see: Richard Dawkins' loss of influence). In addition, numerous atheists have indicated the atheist movement is dead/dying and most people consider the New Atheism movement to be dead/dying (see: Decline of the atheist movement and Decline of militant atheism in the West).Conservative (talk) 13:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT)