Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arizona's 2010 Immigration Act"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
I'm not sure the tone of the article is appropriate. While I agree, and it is obvious, that the bill does not beg racial profiling, asking "liberals" to read the article in the article ("Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.") and then later posing questions to them makes this work seem like a pseudo-homework assignment as opposed to an encyclopedia article--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:24, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
 
I'm not sure the tone of the article is appropriate. While I agree, and it is obvious, that the bill does not beg racial profiling, asking "liberals" to read the article in the article ("Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.") and then later posing questions to them makes this work seem like a pseudo-homework assignment as opposed to an encyclopedia article--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 15:24, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
  
:I deleted the part that you said to delete: "Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please. Thanks..." However, I still think the questions are still appropriate to challenge liberals, but I agree with TK that the tone of the questions to liberals at the end of the article should be changed into a more encyclopediatic form. [[User: Willminator|Willminator]] 16:06, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
+
:I deleted the part that you said to delete: "Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please. Thanks..." However, I still think the questions to liberals at the end are still appropriate to challenge liberals, but I agree with TK that the tone of those questions to liberals should be changed into a more encyclopediatic form. [[User: Willminator|Willminator]] 16:06, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:12, 8 June 2010

Excellent!

Good work, William! I might suggest that you include some of the background on the controversy, especially the fact that the Arizona law is far milder than the Federal statutes, which no one, including Obama, Holder and the DNC, have ever objected to. The "protests" by the left seem to be nothing other than a pedestrian "Red Herring".... --ṬK/Admin/Talk 14:48, 26 May 2010 (EDT)

Thanks for your advice, but today and tommorrow, I'm going to be working on a video that will be up on youtube a few days from today, which will promote this new article I created. Also, I don't know much about the detailed history of the Arizona law. In the meantime, if you or anyone else know more about it than I, can you help me out with that and other needed updates and changes if you wish? That will be of great help to me and will save me a lot of time. God bless you all!!! Willminator 16:27, 26 May 2010 (EDT)
Not about the history of the AZ law, but the federal statutes allow for agents of the Federal Government to stop anyone, at anytime, for reason or not, and demand their "papers". They can detain anyone, which is far more draconian than the Arizona law the liberals are complaining about.....--ṬK/Admin/Talk 19:10, 26 May 2010 (EDT)
Ok, I'll see if I can work on that tommorrow Thursday morning. Willminator 22:11, 26 May 2010 (EDT)
I was only able to find information and a summary of Mexico’s immigration policy, but I can’t find any place that has information on and summarizes U.S immigration policy, which I know, like you said, is less lax on illegal immigrants than Arizona’s new immigration bill. Need some help on that… Willminator 11:01, 27 May 2010 (EDT)

Questions

I'm not sure the tone of the article is appropriate. While I agree, and it is obvious, that the bill does not beg racial profiling, asking "liberals" to read the article in the article ("Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.") and then later posing questions to them makes this work seem like a pseudo-homework assignment as opposed to an encyclopedia article--IDuan 15:24, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

I deleted the part that you said to delete: "Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please. Thanks..." However, I still think the questions to liberals at the end are still appropriate to challenge liberals, but I agree with TK that the tone of those questions to liberals should be changed into a more encyclopediatic form. Willminator 16:06, 8 June 2010 (EDT)