Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aura"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: I don't understand this. The aura surrounds all living things, yet it is produced by the energy generated by the human body. Were there no auras before humans evolved? Why do humans energi...)
 
(Time for a discussion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I don't understand this. The aura surrounds all living things, yet it is produced by the energy generated by the human body. Were there no auras before humans evolved? Why do humans energize the auras of all other organisms, how does that work?--[[User:All Fish Welcome|All Fish Welcome]] 01:10, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
I don't understand this. The aura surrounds all living things, yet it is produced by the energy generated by the human body. Were there no auras before humans evolved? Why do humans energize the auras of all other organisms, how does that work?--[[User:All Fish Welcome|All Fish Welcome]] 01:10, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Time for a discussion here, I think.  First the use of the word "believed", believed by who? AFAIK it isn't mentioned in the Bible.  Is this a religious belief or something akin to astrology or spirualism?  The so-called therapies mentioned are controversial and regarded by some as pseudoscience.  The text should reflect this.  Kirlian photography would seem to demonstrate that plant material also has some sort of aura so not just confined to animals.  Lastly, any reason why my mention of the facts that some psychics claim to be able to see the aura, or that the haloes in religious art are represntations of the aura, were just taken out?  [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 01:59, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:59, May 21, 2007

I don't understand this. The aura surrounds all living things, yet it is produced by the energy generated by the human body. Were there no auras before humans evolved? Why do humans energize the auras of all other organisms, how does that work?--All Fish Welcome 01:10, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Time for a discussion here, I think. First the use of the word "believed", believed by who? AFAIK it isn't mentioned in the Bible. Is this a religious belief or something akin to astrology or spirualism? The so-called therapies mentioned are controversial and regarded by some as pseudoscience. The text should reflect this. Kirlian photography would seem to demonstrate that plant material also has some sort of aura so not just confined to animals. Lastly, any reason why my mention of the facts that some psychics claim to be able to see the aura, or that the haloes in religious art are represntations of the aura, were just taken out? BrianCo 01:59, 21 May 2007 (EDT)