Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bible codes"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Page title)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:Zealot comes across as sounding like they are fanatical and makes them look almost like a cult. That is the only problem I have, the rest of it is till good though.
 
:Zealot comes across as sounding like they are fanatical and makes them look almost like a cult. That is the only problem I have, the rest of it is till good though.
 +
 +
==Title==
 +
I feel that ''Biblical codes'' (or ''Codes in the Bible'') would sound and scan better, though I may be mistaken. These titles would imply, however, that the Bible was discussing codes, so perhaps ''Biblical encoding'' would be more precise. [[User:GuidoF|Guy]]<sup>[[User_talk:GuidoF|message me]]</sup> 07:49, 10 June 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:49, 10 June 2011

Over-powered language

The use of the word 'zealot' in this sentence, 'On the side of some ‘Bible Code’ zealots...' seems a bit too strong of a word. I'm going to change it to 'believers' as it is a softer word that still gets the point across. MHarris

Excellent point! Thanks! :) :) :) PatternOfPersona 20:46, 9 June 2011 (EDT)

Zealot comes across as sounding like they are fanatical and makes them look almost like a cult. That is the only problem I have, the rest of it is till good though.

Title

I feel that Biblical codes (or Codes in the Bible) would sound and scan better, though I may be mistaken. These titles would imply, however, that the Bible was discussing codes, so perhaps Biblical encoding would be more precise. Guymessage me 07:49, 10 June 2011 (EDT)