Difference between revisions of "Talk:Capitalism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Capitalism is not an ideology)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
:I endores this view and beleive Marxist rhetoric needs to be kept out of this article. Capitalism is not an ideology, unlike Marxism, and there is no comparison between the two on that basis.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:I endores this view and beleive Marxist rhetoric needs to be kept out of this article. Capitalism is not an ideology, unlike Marxism, and there is no comparison between the two on that basis.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I'd argue it is, but its tenets are rarely articulated.  Anyone want to take a crack at it?  (The big one seems to be that ANYTHING [[Enron|a corporation]] does to make money is inherently good.)

Revision as of 17:22, April 28, 2007

"Anti Semitic"? You _are_ aware that Karl Marx was Jewish, right? --BobD 18:09, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

  • He was ethnically Jewish yes. However, his parents were converts to Christianity. He was not raised Jewish and wrote many anti-semitic essays. He was a self-hating Jew! Google it. -- CoulterMan 18:14, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Cut:

an economic system where the means of production are privately owned and operated

It's still capitalism, even if the government runs some businesses. There is no bright line of division between free market capitalism and a totally planned economy. Even under the Soviet Union, there was a thriving black market. Maybe we need an economic spectrum to describe the gradations of control. --Ed Poor 05:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

I endores this view and beleive Marxist rhetoric needs to be kept out of this article. Capitalism is not an ideology, unlike Marxism, and there is no comparison between the two on that basis. RobS 13:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
I'd argue it is, but its tenets are rarely articulated. Anyone want to take a crack at it? (The big one seems to be that ANYTHING a corporation does to make money is inherently good.)