Difference between revisions of "Talk:Circumcision"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Why say "male reproductive organ"?)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:: It is rare in the United Kingdom. [[User:Pachyderm|Pachyderm]] 16:38, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:: It is rare in the United Kingdom. [[User:Pachyderm|Pachyderm]] 16:38, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
:: It is also extremely rare in Australia, New Zealand and Russia. [[User:MrGrieves|MrGrieves]] 13:04, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
  
 
== Why say "male reproductive organ"? ==
 
== Why say "male reproductive organ"? ==
  
 
I think the word "penis" is not obscene, are you reluctant to writing it in the first sentence?[[User:Sporean|Sporean]] 12:48, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
 
I think the word "penis" is not obscene, are you reluctant to writing it in the first sentence?[[User:Sporean|Sporean]] 12:48, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:04, 23 April 2008

  • The article says circumcision is common in western countries, but in Europe it isn't nearly as widely practiced. Being intact is far more common there than being circumcised, esp. in Scandinavia. Alf84 19:17, 28 May 2007 (EDT)
That's very true. Circumcision is actually really rare in Europe. I also have a problem with the statistic of Americans who are circumcised - surely that should be referenced? Surely it's not that high? Blackjuice 13:58, 29 May 2007 (EDT)
It is rare in the United Kingdom. Pachyderm 16:38, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
It is also extremely rare in Australia, New Zealand and Russia. MrGrieves 13:04, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

Why say "male reproductive organ"?

I think the word "penis" is not obscene, are you reluctant to writing it in the first sentence?Sporean 12:48, 30 July 2007 (EDT)