Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservapedia Scorecard"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Good point, but this is more of a statistical analysis than merely examples. Maybe "Speakers at Annual Convention/Ideology"? Please edit as you think best.)
(Suggestion for column naming)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:Good point, but this is more of a statistical analysis than merely examples.  Maybe "Speakers at Annual Convention/Ideology"?  Please edit as you think best.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:30, 17 May 2010 (EDT)
 
:Good point, but this is more of a statistical analysis than merely examples.  Maybe "Speakers at Annual Convention/Ideology"?  Please edit as you think best.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:30, 17 May 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I've replaced it with "Profile of Guest Speakers/Contributors", which is more inclusive but supports a statistical viewpoint.  --[[User:ChrisY|ChrisY]] 13:03, 17 May 2010 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 17:03, May 17, 2010

Suggestion for column naming

I've noticed that some of the entities listed, like Newsmax, are of a different nature than groups which would hold conventions. This makes it difficult to put meaningful examples in the column currently titled "Speakers at Annual Convention". I'd like to suggest that the column be renamed to "Examples of Guest Speakers/Contributors", which would lend itself to an across-the-board comparison of the people regarded by these entities as appropriate representatives of their viewpoint. --ChrisY 11:55, 17 May 2010 (EDT)

Good point, but this is more of a statistical analysis than merely examples. Maybe "Speakers at Annual Convention/Ideology"? Please edit as you think best.--Andy Schlafly 12:30, 17 May 2010 (EDT)
I've replaced it with "Profile of Guest Speakers/Contributors", which is more inclusive but supports a statistical viewpoint. --ChrisY 13:03, 17 May 2010 (EDT)