Talk:Darwinius masillae

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search


You were correct to state it is not the classic "missing link", I think new "missing link" should be removed because it suggests a part of the human to ape question has been found, when it hasn't. "Claimed possibly to an ancestor of primates, including humans." This needs liberal wording and should be reworded as such "evolutionists claim it is the ancestor of primates, which they believe is the ancestor of humans."--Jpatt 22:33, 20 May 2009 (EDT)

Good on the missing link. I was going to tweak some wording a little too. Thanks. AddisonDM 22:36, 20 May 2009 (EDT)

Wrong link?

Addison, your second external link (the creationist view) is the exact same as your first external link (the peer-reviewed release). Did you perhaps mean to put This link there instead? I would correct it myself but I want to make sure it's the link you were intending TPost 00:01, 21 May 2009 (EDT)

Thanks! I meant to do Answers in Genesis which is more professional than the other creationist link. Will do. AddisonDM 11:26, 21 May 2009 (EDT)