Difference between revisions of "Talk:Disturbed character"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(last point: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Talk:Disturbed character/Archive Set 1|Archive 1]]
 
[[Talk:Disturbed character/Archive Set 1|Archive 1]]
 +
 +
== last point ==
 +
 +
I understand why Conservative archived the page, but last point I'd like you to address that you didn't get a chance to with the back and forth earlier: if psychology is more inexact art than science, how can you cite anyone as a definitive example of a psychological diagnosis? If it's as easy as lining up the person's reported traits with the symptoms/traits of the diagnosis, then aren't you suggesting you - someone with no formal training - can be exact?--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 11:02, 26 December 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 10:02, 26 December 2013

Archive 1

last point

I understand why Conservative archived the page, but last point I'd like you to address that you didn't get a chance to with the back and forth earlier: if psychology is more inexact art than science, how can you cite anyone as a definitive example of a psychological diagnosis? If it's as easy as lining up the person's reported traits with the symptoms/traits of the diagnosis, then aren't you suggesting you - someone with no formal training - can be exact?--IDuan 11:02, 26 December 2013 (EST)