Difference between revisions of "Talk:Donald Trump achievements: Trade policy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(WTO)
(Punishing China)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
Trump stated in an interview that he's ready to enact $500 billion in tariffs against China: [http://thehill.com/policy/finance/international-taxes/398010-trump-ready-to-go-with-500-billion-in-tariffs-on-china 1],[https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-says-hes-ready-to-impose-tariffs-on-500-billion-in-chinese-imports-1532085168 2],[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china/trump-threatens-tariffs-on-all-500-billion-of-chinese-imports-idUSKBN1KA18Q 3],[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/3/china-announces-60b-of-us-goods-for-tariff-retalia/ 4] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 07:54, 20 July 2018 (EDT)
 
Trump stated in an interview that he's ready to enact $500 billion in tariffs against China: [http://thehill.com/policy/finance/international-taxes/398010-trump-ready-to-go-with-500-billion-in-tariffs-on-china 1],[https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-says-hes-ready-to-impose-tariffs-on-500-billion-in-chinese-imports-1532085168 2],[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china/trump-threatens-tariffs-on-all-500-billion-of-chinese-imports-idUSKBN1KA18Q 3],[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/3/china-announces-60b-of-us-goods-for-tariff-retalia/ 4] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 07:54, 20 July 2018 (EDT)
 
:The Trump Administration could institute up to $467 billion (total) in tariffs soon: [http://thehill.com/policy/finance/405584-trump-vows-for-another-267b-in-tariffs-on-chinese-goods 1],[https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-says-hes-preparing-tariffs-on-further-267-billion-in-chinese-imports-1536340041 2],[https://www.breitbart.com/economics/2018/09/07/trump-says-u-s-is-preparing-another-267-billion-in-china-tariffs/ 3],[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china/trump-ups-ante-on-china-threatens-duties-on-nearly-all-its-imports-idUSKCN1LN1TH 4],[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/trump-prepares-tariffs-on-another-267-billion-of-chinese-goods 5],[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/7/trump-doubling-china-trade-tariffs-ready-go/ 6] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:53, 7 September 2018 (EDT)
 
:The Trump Administration could institute up to $467 billion (total) in tariffs soon: [http://thehill.com/policy/finance/405584-trump-vows-for-another-267b-in-tariffs-on-chinese-goods 1],[https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-says-hes-preparing-tariffs-on-further-267-billion-in-chinese-imports-1536340041 2],[https://www.breitbart.com/economics/2018/09/07/trump-says-u-s-is-preparing-another-267-billion-in-china-tariffs/ 3],[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china/trump-ups-ante-on-china-threatens-duties-on-nearly-all-its-imports-idUSKCN1LN1TH 4],[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/trump-prepares-tariffs-on-another-267-billion-of-chinese-goods 5],[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/7/trump-doubling-china-trade-tariffs-ready-go/ 6] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:53, 7 September 2018 (EDT)
::Trump is reportedly moving forward with $200 billion in additional tariffs on China: [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china/trump-readies-tariffs-on-200-billion-more-chinese-goods-despite-talks-source-idUSKCN1LU2BC 1],[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/14/donald-trump-wants-200-billion-china-tariffs-now-w/ 2],[https://www.voanews.com/a/bloomberg-trump-wants-tariffs-on-about-200-billion-in-chinese-goods/4571995.html 3],[http://thehill.com/policy/finance/406721-trump-moves-forward-with-additional-200-billion-tariffs-on-chinese-goods 4] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:15, 14 September 2018 (EDT)
+
::Trump is reportedly moving forward with $200 billion in additional tariffs on China: [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china/trump-readies-tariffs-on-200-billion-more-chinese-goods-despite-talks-source-idUSKCN1LU2BC 1],[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/14/donald-trump-wants-200-billion-china-tariffs-now-w/ 2],[https://www.voanews.com/a/bloomberg-trump-wants-tariffs-on-about-200-billion-in-chinese-goods/4571995.html 3],[http://thehill.com/policy/finance/406721-trump-moves-forward-with-additional-200-billion-tariffs-on-chinese-goods 4],[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/16/wsj-trump-to-issue-200b-more-tariffs-on-china/ 5],[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/15/trump-gives-green-light-to-tariffs-on-200-billion-in-chinese-goods.html 6] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:15, 14 September 2018 (EDT)
  
 
This White House report written by Peter Navarro is interesting: [https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-white-house-report-authored-by-trade-hawk-blasts-chinese-economic-aggression-1529456401] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:38, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
 
This White House report written by Peter Navarro is interesting: [https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-white-house-report-authored-by-trade-hawk-blasts-chinese-economic-aggression-1529456401] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:38, 20 June 2018 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:03, 16 September 2018

Deal with Mexico

The Trump Administration made a deal with Mexico regarding sugar trade. It has been reported that this is a first step in renegotiating NAFTA,[1][2] but the sugar industry opposes the deal,[3] and at least some conservatives don't like it as well.[4] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2017 (EDT)

Renegotiating with South Korea

The Trump Administration is renegotiating a trade agreement with South Korea.[5][6] I'll try to follow this and see what happens. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:40, 13 July 2017 (EDT)

Please remember that these bilateral negotiations are supposed to take the place of all of the agreements that had been hammered out for the TPP. JDano (talk) 21:01, 13 July 2017 (EDT)
But regardless, the U.S. made bad trade deals with other countries in the past, and the Trump Administration is apparently taking steps to improve them. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:07, 13 July 2017 (EDT)
The U.S. might not pull out of the trade deal -- the establishment/liberal wing of the White House opposes leaving the deal and is trying to get Trump to reconsider: [7] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:46, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
More info on the actual agreement: [8] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:40, 11 September 2017 (EDT)

After initially not wanting to renegotiate, South Korea is now willing to renegotiate: [9] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:43, 4 October 2017 (EDT)

The U.S. has reached a tentative renegotiation deal with South Korea: [10][11][12][13][14] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2018 (EDT)
While this is just a side note, this article calls the changes "modest." I also know that S.K. has a perminent excemption from the alunamin/steel tariffs that Trump instituted. Hopefully, this renegotiation actually produced a real fix rather than a facial victory. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:21, 30 April 2018 (EDT)
This agreement may fall apart, considering that South Korea doesn't want tariffs on its car exports: [15] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:03, 7 August 2018 (EDT)

Punishing China

The Trump Administration is reportedly considering enacting trade measures against China.[16][17][18] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:00, 2 August 2017 (EDT)

Trade Representative Lighthizer is saying he will conduct a thorough investiagation into the China probe that Trump ordered recently.[19] --1990'sguy (talk) 15:50, 16 August 2017 (EDT)
While not a policy move, the Trump Administration stated that the U.S.'s support for China's entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001 was a mistake: [20][21] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:31, 21 January 2018 (EST)
This is a convincing article that, so far, the Trump Administration is losing to China in the current trade war: [22] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:26, 22 May 2018 (EDT)
Another good article on this: [23] --1990'sguy (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2018 (EDT)
Another interesting article: [24] Hopefully, Trump will prove his critics wrong once again. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2018 (EDT)
A somewhat interesting article on the tariff announcements today: [25] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:35, 30 May 2018 (EDT)
Trump's tariffs could hurt the Chinese economy, which is already slowing down: [26] As an aside, I found WaPo's article on the tariff announcement interesting to read (though WaPo is obviously not a fair source), so I'm noting it here: [27] --1990'sguy (talk)
Also, the tariffs could be maing it harder for China to contain its debt: [28] China's stock markets also fell deeply because of the tariffs,[29] though the same thing also happened to the U.S.[30][31] despite recovering later.[32] --1990'sguy (talk) 20:24, 19 June 2018 (EDT)
Another source, for future reference: [33] --1990'sguy (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2018 (EDT)
Since China's economy is seeing its growth slow, Trump's tariffs and other actions could be coming at the right time: [34] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:12, 16 July 2018 (EDT)
I haven't bothered to get past this article's paywall, but it's interesting, showing how Trump's policies on China are different from his predecessors, in that he's adopted Chinese negotiating tactics to get the better of them: [35] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:15, 17 July 2018 (EDT)
Trump's tariffs are already starting to have an effect on the Chinese economy: [36] This may be something to add. --1990'sguy (talk) 08:06, 31 July 2018 (EDT)
Interesting article on Trump's leverage over China it will lose its leverage in the near future: [37] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2018 (EDT)
China's economy is getting far worse, according to Larry Kudlow: [38] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2018 (EDT)
More on China's economic problems: [39] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:08, 22 August 2018 (EDT)

Trump stated in an interview that he's ready to enact $500 billion in tariffs against China: 1,2,3,4 --1990'sguy (talk) 07:54, 20 July 2018 (EDT)

The Trump Administration could institute up to $467 billion (total) in tariffs soon: 1,2,3,4,5,6 --1990'sguy (talk) 13:53, 7 September 2018 (EDT)
Trump is reportedly moving forward with $200 billion in additional tariffs on China: 1,2,3,4,5,6 --1990'sguy (talk) 22:15, 14 September 2018 (EDT)

This White House report written by Peter Navarro is interesting: [40] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:38, 20 June 2018 (EDT)

The Chinese government's newpaper is admitting that having the U.S. be dependent on China is a very bad thing, which is interesting as it aligns with opponents of China: [41] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:43, 12 July 2018 (EDT)
China's statement on Trump's decision to look into possibly raising the proposed tariff rate on Chinese goods: [42] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:46, 2 August 2018 (EDT)
More on China's response and the Trump Administration's counter-response: [43][44][45][46][47] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2018 (EDT)
Kevin Hassett, a White House economic advisor, floated the notion of kicking China out of the WTO: [48] --1990'sguy (talk) 11:36, 13 August 2018 (EDT)
Interesting article on China's goal of dominance over the U.S., and the "trade war": [49] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:46, 23 August 2018 (EDT)

More trade actions

The Trump Administration appears to be moving toward imposing tariffs on half of all Chinese imports even as it's arranging a meeting between the two countries: [50] --1990'sguy (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2018 (EDT)

The trade talks apparently did not succeed: [51][52] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:46, 23 August 2018 (EDT)

China opening up its markets

China just ended its tariffs on U.S. broiler chickens: [53] This seems like a good thing (though I'm a bit puzzled as to why it is doing this in the face of potential major U.S. tariffs against it), but it's probably not significant enough to add. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2018 (EST)

China is now appearing to take a more conciliatory stance on trade after Trump imposed large tariffs on the country: [54][55][56] --1990'sguy (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2018 (EDT)
Regardless, China just retaliated with its own set of tariffs: [57][58][59][60][61] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:58, 1 April 2018 (EDT)
And another announcement: [62][63][64] --1990'sguy (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2018 (EDT)
China stated it would open up its market in response to U.S. tariffs,[65][66][67][68][69][70] but not after it filed a compaint on the tariffs at the WTO.[71] --1990'sguy (talk) 12:15, 10 April 2018 (EDT)
While Trump had kind words for that announcement,[72] the White House, fortunately, is cautious.[73][74] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2018 (EDT)
A possible concession by China?[75] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2018 (EDT)

I'm concerned about the potential concessions to China over ZTE that Trump made earlier today, possibly undoing the ban on the company that I added to at least one other sub-article and its talk page. We'll see what happens, but hopefully, the outcome will be good: [76][77][78][79][80][81] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:43, 13 May 2018 (EDT)

More on this: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 9 --1990'sguy (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2018 (EDT)
This article is obviously critical of Trump (probably overly, considering that the MSM generally opposes tough action against China), but this is still something to watch out for: [82] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:42, 15 May 2018 (EDT)
Trump is forcefully dfending the ZTE comments: [83][84] --1990'sguy (talk) 10:32, 16 May 2018 (EDT)
More great statements on China, not necessarily on ZTE: [85][86][87][88] --1990'sguy (talk) 20:38, 17 May 2018 (EDT)
ZTE should be seen in light of the North Korean negotiations. Trump used trade sanctions on China to weigh on China to force North Korea to the table. China adhered to certain steps in the process, for which Trump has agreed to make other concessions in return, along an agreed upon timetable. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 21:03, 17 May 2018 (EDT)
Trump has apparently reached a deal with China on ZTE, though no official announcement has been made yet: [89][90][91][92] It seems like a pretty good deal to me, though I would have enjoyed seeing the company's destruction. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2018 (EDT)

It will be interesting to see what comes out of this joint announcement between the U.S. and China on the latter's alleged promise to purchase more U.S. products: 1,2,3,4,5,6 --1990'sguy (talk) 14:32, 19 May 2018 (EDT)

The U.S. is putting its tariffs on hold: 1,2,3,4,5,6 More on the trade deal: [93] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:55, 20 May 2018 (EDT)
More good statements from Trump (1,2,3,4,5,6) and other administration officials (1,2). More interesting articles about these trade negotitations (1,2,3). --1990'sguy (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2018 (EDT)
Mnuchin has stated that the U.S. can still enact its trade tariffs if the trade discussion don't go anywhere: [94] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2018 (EDT)
China announced it would reduce its car import tariffs.[95] While the media reported that a ZTE agreement was reached (1,2), Trump denied this (1,2,3). Trump and Mnuchin made strong statements on trade today (1,2,3,4), with Mnuchin saying the alumanim tariffs will remain in place.[96] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:26, 22 May 2018 (EDT)
More good statements: [97][98][99][100] --1990'sguy (talk) 12:52, 23 May 2018 (EDT)

Negoitations will resume again: [101] --1990'sguy (talk) 12:05, 16 August 2018 (EDT)

It seems like a deal is becoming less likely: [102] --1990'sguy (talk) 13:53, 7 September 2018 (EDT)

Likely failures

Trump failed to label China a currency manipulator several times already,[103][104] and he refused to do it again: [105][106] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:42, 13 April 2018 (EDT)

On the other hand, Trump did criticize China (along with Russia) for currency devaluation: [107][108] Hopefully, the "currency manipulator" label isn't simply wishful thinking yet. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:26, 16 April 2018 (EDT)
Trump is now criticizng China's currency manipulation (along with the EU's manipulation): [109][110][111][112] Hopefully, he will label China a currency manipulator. --1990'sguy (talk) 20:20, 20 July 2018 (EDT)

NAFTA renegotation

The tone taken by the U.S. on renegotiating NAFTA is much different from that of Canada and Mexico.[113] The U.S. is emphasizing the agreement's failures and wants bigger changes, but Canada and Mexico like the agreement. The coming talks will be interesting -- hopefully, the U.S. will get something out of them. --1990'sguy (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2017 (EDT)

And to clarify, the NAFTA renegotiation talks just began.[114] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2017 (EDT)
The U.S. is taking a strong stance on the renegotiation: [115] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:53, 17 August 2017 (EDT)
What conservatives and liberals want from the NAFTA renegotation: [116] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:45, 5 April 2018 (EDT)
Hopefully, the Trump Administration will get a good (and real) renegotation deal, but I also hope it ultimately decides to leave the agreement. Good article on this: [117] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2018 (EDT)
Here's another good article on the danger NAFTA poses to U.S. sovereignty: [118] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:30, 4 May 2018 (EDT)
The apparent shift in negotiations to bilateral is a good thing, and hopefully, this will be the outcome of the negotations: [119] --1990'sguy (talk) 07:48, 14 June 2018 (EDT)
The U.S. is reuming negotiations with only Mexico, a sign that it will go the bilateral route -- however, it should be noted that even bilateral treaties are under the authority of the WTO, so it's not necessarily a great thing: [120] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2018 (EDT)
However, Canada and Mexico are saying that NAFTA should remain trilateral: [121] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2018 (EDT)
Interesting article on NATFA renegotiation's threat to U.S. sovereignty: [122] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:03, 7 August 2018 (EDT)
The U.S. reportedly dropped its demand to restrict Mexican agriculture exports: [123] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2018 (EDT)

Deep state opposes NAFTA renegotiation

The U.S. deep state is apparently opposed to the Trump Administration's renegotiation of NAFTA.[124] Hopefully, the Senate will approve some more trade nominees to help weaken the deep state. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:59, 19 October 2017 (EDT)

Agreement reached between U.S. and Mexico

Trump announced today that the U.S. an Mexico announced an agreement to renegotiate NAFTA (sources: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, details: 1,2) I like the fact that the proposed deal won't be called "NAFTA", but will rather have a name that includes the U.S. and Mexico by name. Why am I not adding this now? Because this is an agreement in principle -- nothing has been signed, nothing appears to be formal yet, and Congress hasn't ratified this yet. Also, Canada's status is yet to be determined. But please -- comment here if you disagree. More sources on this: 1,2,3, stock market rise: 1,2,3 --1990'sguy (talk) 23:46, 27 August 2018 (EDT)

More sources on this: 1,2,3,4,5 --1990'sguy (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2018 (EDT)
If Canada doesn't join, the U.S. may enact auto tariffs on it: [125] --1990'sguy (talk) 11:59, 28 August 2018 (EDT)
The New American, one of the most consistently conservative news sources I know of, is skeptical of this new deal, and pointed out several causes for concern: [126][127][128][129] On the other hand, this article describes the deal as a win for Trump, as the U.S. got a lot of what it wanted, and Mexico got little: [130] --1990'sguy (talk) 15:46, 28 August 2018 (EDT)
Kris Kobach also likes the deal, though he seems more interested in the economics of it: [131] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:40, 28 August 2018 (EDT)
Let's see what happens, with regards to Trump's off-the-record comments on Canada that the media made public: 1,2,3 --1990'sguy (talk) 14:04, 31 August 2018 (EDT)
An agreement was not reached today, though negotiations will continue -- in the meantime, the U.S.-Mexico deal was sent to Congress: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 --1990'sguy (talk) 22:38, 31 August 2018 (EDT)
Some great statements by Trump on NAFTA and negotiations with Canada: 1,2,3,4,5,6 --1990'sguy (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2018 (EDT)
More on this: 1,2,3 --1990'sguy (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2018 (EDT)

Interesting article

Probably not an article to add, but this Washington Times article is an interesting read. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:28, 6 September 2017 (EDT)

Here's another good one: [132] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:54, 11 September 2017 (EDT)
Some great statements by Trump on trade: [133] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:38, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
This article, regardless of how correct the author is, about an alleged conflict between Trump's trade and energy policies, is interesting to read: [134] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:00, 26 June 2018 (EDT)

Here are some good op-ed articles on tariffs and Trump's trade policies: [135][136] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:37, 27 July 2018 (EDT)

Canada wants U.S. to abolish right-to-work

The Canadian government wants the U.S. to abolish right-to-work as part of their NAFTA negotiations because this makes the U.S. more competitive.[137] This is really dumb because the Canadian government could just reform their own system to make it more attractive. Fortunately, it will probably be practically impossible for Congress to do this, and hopefully, the Trump Administration will reject this request. --1990'sguy (talk) 17:54, 11 September 2017 (EDT)

Going soft on trade?

The Trump Administration is saying that it is temporarily taking a softer stance on trade in order to appease Congress so they pass tax reform.[138][139] Hopefully, this softer stance will actually be temporary and not become permanent. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:13, 22 September 2017 (EDT)

Tariffs

The International Trade Commission has recommended that the Trump Administration to raise tariffs on solar power imports.[140][141] --1990'sguy (talk) 09:11, 1 November 2017 (EDT)

The Trump Administration is imposing several other minor tariffs: [142][143][144] These might be things we should add, though they may not be very significant, and the ITC has not approved at least some of them yet. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:46, 13 April 2018 (EDT)
Several major trade decisions may be made this coming month: [145] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2018 (EDT)
Several countries are preparing retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. in retaliation to its tariffs: [146] Hopefully, the Trump Administration won't bend in the face of them. --1990'sguy (talk) 12:52, 23 May 2018 (EDT)
An interesting (though somewhat biased) article discussing Trump's trade agenda: [147] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:51, 29 May 2018 (EDT)
Despite the globalist hysteria over Trump's tariffs, most economists don't think they will be all that bad -- a National Association for Business Economics survey found that only 2.4% of economists think the tariffs will have a very bad effect on the economy: [148] This is opposed to over 12% of economists believing they will have be a net positive and 46% who think they will be "marginally negative." --1990'sguy (talk) 21:21, 4 June 2018 (EDT)
Also, Trump's G7 dispute with Canada is not making any impact on the markets, despite what anti-Trumpers might fears: [149] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2018 (EDT)
Some articles/news on the Commerce Department auto tariff investigation: [150][151][152] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:53, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
More retaliatory tariffs from the EU and Canada: [153][154][155][156][157] Fortunately, the Trump Administration isn't backing down from its tariff positions: [158][159][160][161] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:23, 2 July 2018 (EDT)
If Europe or its car companies make concessions, the U.S. could abandon its proposed car tariffs: [162] If the concessions are substantial, this will be good, but we'll see what ultimately happens. --1990'sguy (talk) 08:45, 5 July 2018 (EDT)
More Chinese retaliatory tariffs: [163] --1990'sguy (talk) 08:05, 10 July 2018 (EDT)
Trump warned about more auto tariffs on the EU if they don't negotiate right: [164] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:43, 12 July 2018 (EDT)
The EU will negotiate with the Trump Administration on this: [165][166] --1990'sguy (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2018 (EDT)
However, the EU is refusing to do no tariffs (both ways) with the U.S., and it seems more interested in fighting rather than reaching a deal: [167] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2018 (EDT)

There is a dispute between the U.S. and Rwanda over the latter's trade policies: [168] It may not be as significant as trade relations with China, but it is still something good to watch. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2018 (EDT)

Trump's statements on fighting for American farmers on trade: [169][170] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2018 (EDT)
Americans are more skeptical of our trade agreements than in the past: [171] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:43, 13 July 2018 (EDT)
Another poll which also shows American discontent with current "free" trade agreements: [172] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:23, 15 July 2018 (EDT)
Interesting article which states that the tariffs may actually help American farmers, something going against the globalist consensus: [173] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:13, 25 July 2018 (EDT)
This UBS poll found that the vast majority of business owners support Trump's tariffs: [174][175] --1990'sguy (talk) 20:19, 2 August 2018 (EDT)
The Commerce Department is apparently delaying the final report of the Trump Administration's investigation into auto imports: [176][177] --1990'sguy (talk) 11:24, 21 August 2018 (EDT)

The Trump Administration will lower the rate of its proposed newsprint tariffs on Canada: [178] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2018 (EDT)

The U.S. ITC struck them down: [179][180][181] --1990'sguy (talk) 13:53, 29 August 2018 (EDT)

Reciprocal tax

President Trump is apparently planning on a reciprocal tax on countries that have tariffs on U.S. exports: [182][183][184][185] Hopefully, he has the authority to do it without Congress. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:52, 12 February 2018 (EST)

Aluminum and steel tariffs

President Trump stated he would enact major tariffs on aluminum and steel imports next week,[186][187][188][189] though the details are not finalized.[190] If this is the case, it means the White House globalists have failed.[191] Trump seems to strongly support these tariffs even despite opposition from globalists and the establishment, which is good.[192][193][194][195] Hopefully, what he signs next week will be the same as what he announced yesterday. Here are some other interesting articles on this issue: [196][197] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:30, 2 March 2018 (EST)

Australia may be exempt from the tariffs: [198] As an aside, this article by The New American shows that giving the executive branch authority over tariffs is probably unconstitutional: [199] (Trump's decision is an achievement regardless, and many other presidents -- Reagan, Bush, etc. -- used that authority, and much worse). --1990'sguy (talk) 23:15, 9 March 2018 (EST)
Apparently, several countries, including the EU as a whole, will get exemptions from the tariffs.[200][201][202] --1990'sguy (talk) 13:54, 22 March 2018 (EDT)
Trump is extending the exemptions for the tariffs, but it has apparently reached agreements with several of the countries involved on steel/aluminum imports, with at least some involving quotas: [203][204][205][206][207][208][209] Many of the details are not out, and many of the individual agreements are "in principle", so it may not be a good idea to add these right now -- but these should be added once finalized, especially if quotas are involved. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:40, 30 April 2018 (EDT)
The Trump Administration intends to finish the tariff negotiations in the coming month: [210][211] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:47, 1 May 2018 (EDT)
I should have added this a while ago, but Brazil reportedly did not reach an agreement in principle as of May 1, contrary to what the Trump Administration announced a month ago: [212][213] Of course, this was a while ago, and if it's even true, the situation has probably changed by now. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:41, 31 May 2018 (EDT)

So far, contrary to the claims of free trade alarmists, aluminum prices have fallen since Trump's tariff announcements: [214] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:55, 6 April 2018 (EDT)

The aluminum tariff is basically an embargo on Andy McCabe's personal friend, Oleg Deripaska, who made his $5.1 billion as an aluminum exporter. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 21:11, 17 May 2018 (EDT)

A great op-ed in support of the tariffs: [215] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:59, 2 June 2018 (EDT)

Another good article in support, though I don't see a place for it in the actual article: [216] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:38, 8 July 2018 (EDT)

Returning jobs

Due to Trump's tariff announcement, a U.S. steel company based in Illinois announced it would bring back 500 jobs: [217][218][219][220][221] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2018 (EST)

Here's what's left of the US steel industry. Today its a ghost town. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 18:13, 25 April 2018 (EDT)

The effect on the order on steel/aluminum stocks is interesting, but I probably won't add it since the market keeps going up and down -- their stocks rose strongly when the tariffs were announced,[222][223] but they fell after the tariffs weren't as strong as expected.[224] I haven't found an article discussing a more long-term trend. Also, I found this article on "winners and losers" from those tariffs, but because of a paywall, I'm unable to read the article, so I'll post it here for future reference.[225] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2018 (EDT)

While I added the original Reuters article (since it is the original), the title of the same article published in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch is more friendly to Trump (or less hostile toward him) compared to the original article's title. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:37, 25 May 2018 (EDT)
Interesting article on the reception of Trump's tariffs in Minnesota: [226] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2018 (EDT)
Toyota may sell fewer imported cars in the U.S. because of the tariffs, possibly building more in the U.S.: [227] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2018 (EDT)
This WSJ article doesn't have a very positive view of the tariffs, though the article doesn't mention any negative effects besides higher prices: [228] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2018 (EDT)

While not a direct example of returning jobs, Ford won't import its Chinese-made cars because of Trump's tariffs: [229] --1990'sguy (talk) 13:42, 31 August 2018 (EDT)

Congressional obstruction?

Globalist Republicans will try to pass a bill reducing Trump's powers to enact tariffs, something McConnell is OK with so long as the bill is snuck inside a must-pass spending bill: [230][231][232][233] --1990'sguy (talk) 20:44, 5 June 2018 (EDT)

The Senate passed a symbolic resolution calling for more oversight over tariff matters: [234][235] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2018 (EDT)
The Senate passed a bill to cut tariffs on hundreds of products from China, even though China has done nothing to lower its tariffs (the epitome of stupidity on the part of the U.S. Senate): [236][237] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2018 (EDT)

Tariff excemptions

Wilber Ross announced the first set of exceptions to the steel/aluminum tariffs: [238][239] I don't know if I should even make a small note of this in the article (probably not, since this is supposed to be the first of many announcements out of many requests:[240][241]) I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens. --1990'sguy (talk) 07:50, 22 June 2018 (EDT)

The U.S. might give the Russian aluminum producer Rusal an exemption from its tariffs: [242][243][244] --1990'sguy (talk) 08:59, 21 July 2018 (EDT)
Interesting article on tariff exemption rejections for U.S. energy companies: [245] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:40, 28 August 2018 (EDT)
Trump signed a proclamation on tariff exemptions: [246][247][248][249] --1990'sguy (talk) 11:12, 30 August 2018 (EDT)

CPTPP

The countries that negotiated the TPP are now negotiating a new agreement, the CPTPP. The U.S. will not be part of this agreement, according to reports, and this is a good thing if true.[250][251] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:47, 12 November 2017 (EST)

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said recently that the U.S. might rejoin the TPP after all: [252] Hopefully, this won't happen. --1990'sguy (talk) 14:27, 3 March 2018 (EST)
The new treaty was signed by 11 countries, excluding the U.S.: [253][254][255][256] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2018 (EST)
Mnuchin again stated the U.S. would look into rejoining the TPP: [257] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:58, 21 March 2018 (EDT)
President Trump reportedly ordered his aides to look into rejoining the TPP[258][259][260][261][262][263] (which would probably be a bad idea no matter what, since the organization did away with reforms it apparently proposed to appease the U.S.[264]). --1990'sguy (talk) 18:55, 12 April 2018 (EDT)
Fortunately, Trump clarified his comments: [265][266] --1990'sguy (talk) 12:02, 13 April 2018 (EDT)
Here's an interesting article about the TPP -- it might not actually contain China: [267] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:42, 13 April 2018 (EDT)
Fortunately, Larry Kudlow appears to be downplaying the chance of the U.S. rejoining TPP: [268][269] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:21, 17 April 2018 (EDT)
Trump himself is still skeptical: [270][271][272][273] --1990'sguy (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2018 (EDT)

Here's a good reminder of what Trump said in 2016 about the TPP: [274] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2018 (EDT)

Here's a good video (in addition to the article above) on why the TPP would not contain China: [275] --1990'sguy (talk) 08:38, 11 May 2018 (EDT)
Here's another good article on how the TPP would integrate the U.S. with China and Russia: [276] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:53, 14 June 2018 (EDT)

Trade appointments

I looked at some of Trump's trade nominees. Robert Lighthizer, who has already been confirmed and sworn in, is taking a strong stance on trade,[277], while Jeffrey Gerrish, Stephen Vaughn, and Dennis Shea either already serve or have been nominated to important trade positions.[278][279] I will add this to the article soon. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:45, 19 November 2017 (EST)

Here are more articles on Lighthizer (mainly from the MSM): [280][281][282][283][284][285] --1990'sguy (talk) 15:37, 3 January 2018 (EST)

Trade deficit

In 2017, the trade deficit reached its highest level since 2008: [286][287] This can be explained by the fact that President Trump has barely started reforming U.S. trade policy, but hopefully, he and his administration will take a tougher stance on trade real soon. --1990'sguy (talk) 13:16, 6 February 2018 (EST)

Another article on this: [288] --1990'sguy (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2018 (EST)
Fortunately, the trade deficit fell -- the largest one-month decline in two years: [289][290] Also, Canada's trade purplus with the U.S. fell to the lowest level in two years: [291] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:21, 3 May 2018 (EDT)
The trade deficit decreased slightly due to increased exports: [292] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2018 (EDT)

International forums and other groups

Hopefully, the Trump Administration will stand up for its agenda at the G20 finance summit, as this article already indicates: [293] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2018 (EDT)

This might be the final statement from the G20: [294] Not the best, but could be worse. --1990'sguy (talk) 09:04, 21 March 2018 (EDT)
The other six countries of the G7 released a statement opposing Trump's trade actions: [295] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:37, 2 June 2018 (EDT)
The EU and U.S. will establish "a dialogue" soon to discuss their trade differences: [296] We'll see what actually becomes of this. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:04, 8 June 2018 (EDT)
So far, Trump has maintrained a strong line on trade at the G7 summit, though he has also called for a complete removal of all trade barriers (which is slightly concerning, though not surprising and not completely bad): 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 However, the U.S. is reportedly signing on the joint G7 statement, despite the differences on trade policy: 1,2 --1990'sguy (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2018 (EDT)
The G7 agreed to a joint statement that included wording opposing protectionism: [297] However, Trump later stated that he would refuse to endorse the statement after Justin Trudeau criticized him again (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8). --1990'sguy (talk) 21:37, 9 June 2018 (EDT)
Here's the statement Trump just rejected: [298] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:30, 9 June 2018 (EDT)
Navarro referred to the joint statement as one promoting socialist views (which is probably true): 1,2,3 Some other interesting articles: [299][300] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2018 (EDT)

A slightly interesting article that might be useful in the future: [301] --1990'sguy (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2018 (EDT)

The EU and China are joining together to fight Trump's America First trade policies: [302] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2018 (EDT)

WTO

The Trump Administration is suing China through the WTO: [303] We'll see what happens with this. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:26, 23 March 2018 (EDT)

And now, China is suing the U.S. through the WTO: [304] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2018 (EDT)
This article is interesting: [305] The WTO is a threat to U.S. sovereignty, and it looks like the Trump Administration is allowing the organization to dictate U.S. policy. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:53, 23 April 2018 (EDT)
Another article illustrating this threat: [306] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:39, 17 May 2018 (EDT)
Fortunately, the Trump Administration is suggesting it won't listen to WTO rulings: [307] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2018 (EDT)
Here's a somewhat-interesting article on this: [308] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2018 (EDT)
The Trump Administration is threatening to veto any WTO ruling that takes longer than 90 days: [309] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2018 (EDT)
Trump reportedly talked about potentially leaving the WTO,[310][311][312] though he denied it.[313][314][315] --1990'sguy (talk) 19:24, 29 June 2018 (EDT)
The Trump Administration has apparently been drafting a bill to allow it to raise tariffs whenever it wants without congressional assent: [316][317] I like the effect it would have in going against "international community" norms, but it would (or should) be unconstitutional, since Congress has the power to institute tariffs. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:16, 1 July 2018 (EDT)
A good perspective on the bill -- it doesn't appear to have been a serious idea, and it's not even necessary: [318] --1990'sguy (talk) 11:59, 2 July 2018 (EDT)
Trump's response to these reports: 1,2,3,4,5 --1990'sguy (talk) 16:42, 2 July 2018 (EDT)
Nice! Trump stated he would withdraw from the WTO minus reforms on their part: [319] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2018 (EDT)

Interesting -- even "bilateral" trade deals, which are better than multilateral ones, are still under WTO authority: [320] --1990'sguy (talk) 08:36, 13 July 2018 (EDT)

The Trump Administration is tring to push back against the growing power of the WTO, but its efforts are probably not enough: [321] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:29, 19 July 2018 (EDT)
More on the dangers of the WTO: [322] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:30, 13 September 2018 (EDT)
G20 trade ministers are calling for "WTO reform", a phrase which is worrying: [323] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2018 (EDT)

The U.S. filed WTO challenges to retaliatory tariffs enacted by other countries: [324][325] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:12, 16 July 2018 (EDT)

Protecting domestic car production

This is interesting: the Trump Administration is considering tightening environmental regulations on foreign cars in order to protect the domestic car-production industry: [326][327][328][329] I can see how this can become a slippery slope to more domestic environmental regulations, but it still seems like a smart move that takes advantage of the leftist environmental/regulatory agenda to actually advance a conservative agenda. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2018 (EDT)

Trade investigations

The Trump Administration is investigating whether China is dumping steel wheels on the U.S. market: [330] This may be something to add, though it seems rather minor compared to the other investigations already in this article (though maybe it's appropriate to add). --1990'sguy (talk) 23:13, 18 April 2018 (EDT)

Intellectual property

The USTR kept China (unsurprisingly) on its watch list for intellectual property, and it added Canada to the list: [331] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:35, 28 April 2018 (EDT)

"Buy America" bill

Apparently, in the omnibus spending bill was an act strengthening the laws already in place requiring federal government agencies to buy only from American companies: [332] Unfortunately, the only good article I found about this mainly discussed agencies apparently doing little to comply with the law. I want to add this, but I want better articles first (and it's probably too early to count this as a failure, since the bill just became law, so it's too early to say there's a lack of enforcement). --1990'sguy (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2018 (EDT)

Made in America

Trump hosted a "Made in America" event today: [333][334] This might possibly be something to add to the article as a "non-policy" achievement, though, though I'd like to see some more good sources before adding. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:51, 23 July 2018 (EDT)

Interesting article on public support for "Made in America": [335] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2018 (EDT)

More on this general topic

Trump is reportedly preparing an executive order expanding his "buy American" policy for government infrastructure projects: [336] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:18, 16 August 2018 (EDT)

Open skies agreements

I will add this in a moment, but I'm adding surplus sources here now: [337][338][339][340][341] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:27, 17 May 2018 (EDT)

Great statements on trade

Some very great comments today, with Trump stating that "Tariffs are the greatest!": [342][343][344] This may be a statement to add, but I don't know how much it would fit with the other info in the "Other achievements" section. As an aside, here's a good op-ed in support of the tariffs that might be good to add if I can find a place for it: [345] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:43, 24 July 2018 (EDT)

Some more great statements defending his trade/tariff policies: [346][347][348][349][350] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2018 (EDT)
Trump is not backing down on trade, based on remarks made to major CEOs today: [351][352][353][354] --1990'sguy (talk) 23:03, 7 August 2018 (EDT)
More statements: [355] --1990'sguy (talk) 11:51, 8 August 2018 (EDT)
More statements, though this interview also covers other topics: [356] --1990'sguy (talk) 09:26, 16 August 2018 (EDT)
Another great (and very true) statement: [357] --1990'sguy (talk) 13:33, 16 August 2018 (EDT)
Another great statement: [358] --1990'sguy (talk) 15:46, 28 August 2018 (EDT)
More great comments, telling Apple that they'll avoid tariffs if it moves its factories back to the U.S.: 1,2,3,4,5 --1990'sguy (talk) 19:41, 8 September 2018 (EDT)
More great statements: 1,2 --1990'sguy (talk) 08:47, 10 September 2018 (EDT)
Some of the statements above were on Ford, but unfortunately, Ford doesn't want to make more of its products in the U.S.:[359] --1990'sguy (talk) 13:51, 10 September 2018 (EDT)
Great response to reports on new China talks: [360][361] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:26, 13 September 2018 (EDT)

Trade with the EU

Trump and Jean-Claude Juncker announced a deal between their two governments for non-auto industrial products, where they would work toward no tariffs, barriers, and subsidies, and they said the EU would import more agricultural products. Also, it appears that Trump won't institute the proposed auto tariffs: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 This appears to be very good news, and I am very tempted to add it to the article, but it appears to be just an announcement of an intention to do these things. The two leaders said they would appoint a working group to negotiate a deal, so a formal deal probably hasn't been reached. We'll see what happens. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:22, 25 July 2018 (EDT)

According to Larry Kudlow, the EU will help the U.S. confront China on trade. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2018 (EDT)
The New American, a very good conservative publication, does not like this deal (or statement of intentions)[362][363] -- this is mainly because of the EU's promise to help the U.S. "reform" the WTO (which I forgot to mention as a part of the agreement), as well as the fact that the U.S. won't institute any more tariffs despite the EU having much higher auto tariffs (something which won't be addressed in the negotiations). --1990'sguy (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2018 (EDT)
Another interesting article on this apparent "shift" in tactics: [364] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:49, 26 July 2018 (EDT)
More on this overall development: [365] --1990'sguy (talk) 21:57, 26 July 2018 (EDT)
The Trump Administration's gas deal with the EU, also part of this agreement (which I once again forgot to mention) could hurt Russia's economy: [366] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:53, 26 July 2018 (EDT)
Ted Malloch, who was believed to have been a candidate for the EU ambassador nomination (though the article incorrectly calls him the sitting ambassador) said that the Trump Administration would not make trade deals with the EU as a bloc: [367] Interesting how it's apparently changed. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:37, 27 July 2018 (EDT)
Another article about the soybean export issue: [368] --1990'sguy (talk) 16:24, 28 July 2018 (EDT)
EU soybean imports from the U.S. almost quadrupled early this year, though it appears to have been because of market forces rather than any government action: [369][370] --1990'sguy (talk) 08:50, 1 August 2018 (EDT)
More on the apparent EU-U.S. gas deal: [371] --1990'sguy (talk) 10:05, 1 August 2018 (EDT)
The EU wants the U.S. to drop all restrictions it has on exporting its natural gas: [372] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:45, 9 August 2018 (EDT)

Something concerning to watch out for -- the Trump Administration may seek to move forward with the same trade deal that the Obama Administration sought with the EU: [373] --1990'sguy (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2018 (EDT)

Overall trade negotiations

This is an interesting article on Trump's trade negotiations with other countries so far: [374] --1990'sguy (talk) 12:13, 11 August 2018 (EDT)

Gary Cohn, with the support of Rob Porter, reportedly took documents off Trump's desk that would have withdrawn the U.S. from NAFTA and KORUS: [375] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:53, 4 September 2018 (EDT)
The U.S. and Japan have begun trade negotiations: [376] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2018 (EDT)
Another example of Cohn and Porter obstructing Trump's trade agenda: [377] --1990'sguy (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2018 (EDT)

Subsidies

I removed this info:

See also:

I did so because even though this could be considered a good example of economic nationalism in action, they are still subsidies (meaning large government spending). Also, this was intended to be temporary, as the U.S. finds a permanent solution, and it doesn't seem very significant to include. Thus, I will keep it out of the article. --1990'sguy (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2018 (EDT)

Another source on this: [378] --1990'sguy (talk) 17:53, 4 September 2018 (EDT)