Talk:Environmentalist

Give a pat on the back to whoever changed this article from hateful Environmentalist bashing to something that's certainly more pleasant. Good job.

Give some justification as to why claim is appropriate. Alot of people that call themselves environmentalists do seek to protect the environment. Claim gives the impression of people saying one theing and doing something else. -Gasmonkey

from the ATTAC REPORT:

Greenpeace Founding/Supervisory Organizations:

• Red China
• Soviet intelligence apparatus (KGB/FSB)
• World Peace Council (WPC)

Supporting Organizations:

• Red Army Fraction (RAF)
• Earth First! (EF!)
• Institute for Policy Studies (IPS)

Greenpeace

Type of Organization: Semi-violent/protest-organizing

Location: United States, Canada, various European nations, Soviet Russia, Red China, & others

Ideological cover: Environmentalist

Activities: Political & legal activism; provocation & incitement to violence; political & logistical support for terrorism

Target countries: United States, Canada, Western European nations, & others

Status: Confirmed active

Assisted Organizations:

• Earth First! (EF!)
• Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE)
• Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS)

Derivative/Controlled Organizations:

• Earth Liberation Front (ELF)
• Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS)

RobS 20:30, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

I'm an environmentalist and I don't belong to Greenpeace. Great job at generalizing there cheif. Just because ONE group of a FEW environmentaly minded people at some times go too far and commit crimes you generalize that to all environmetalists? Seriously, congrats on that. Are you a Christian? Well, then you are proably an Aryan skinhead too by your logic. After all, they claim to be Christians too.

I'm a corncerned environmentalist about the environment, too. That's why I thought my lagunage was pretty good.. What we are discussing here is organizations claiming to be environmentalist, which may have other agendas. I'm sure we can get some gound language rounded out. RobS 23:45, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

The ATTAC guys also claim that the PLO is behind 9/11 [1]. I'd be wary of giving them any credence. --Scrap 23:46, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Be wary of them? that's not anti-Semitic comment, is it? RobS 00:12, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

if you claim to be an environmentalist and do something else then u aren't really an environmentalist. if I claimed to be a republican but voted for and believed in democratic veiws would I still be a republican?--Benburned 00:18, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

A person can be 40% environmentalist with 60% dedicated to another agenda. Likewise it's not uncommon at all for crossover votes. RobS 14:43, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

The religuion of nature

American, you were on to something, and it's even poetic, but it gets a little sarcastic at the end. I'll try and save what I can. This part,

There's an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there's a fall from grace into a state of pollution

can be backed up with scripture, Genesis "because thou hast sinned, cursed is the ground for thy sake". RobS 12:34, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

Worship of Gaia?

Where is the sourced information for this section? The only source in it is a link to some speech Michael Crichton made. How is he an expert on any of this? Please clarify, or let's get rid of it. --Colest 16:04, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

No kidding, it's almost incoherent. Pendayho 16:11, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

Tis hilarious. Especially the Al Gore picture. I'm going to find me some other 'hilarious' pictures to plaster all over the site. Should be some good George Bush ones. --Wikinterpreter^{Liaise with the cabal?}

And let us not forget about how mockery is a tool exclusive to the liberal repetoire. Oh and it's good to see how it all got put back with no attempt at an explination. --Colest 18:06, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

Mockery? It is all very well cited, and only encapuslated. RobS 18:11, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

Well cited? I like ATTAC: (I quote directly) which describes itself as 'A Hasidic Analysis of World War III'. The link up, which draws lines from Greenpeace, and the Sierra Club, to 'revolutionary communist terror cells', has had me laugh quite a bit. It's almost as good as this. --Wikinterpreter^{Liaise with the cabal?}

My mockery comment was more directed at the purposeful choice of pictures of liberals that make them look either 1) goofy or 2) sinister. --Colest 18:47, 11 May 2007 (EDT

Shall I replace it with this? I'm not sure having a picture of Al Gore serves any purpose beyond that which I would be loath to accuse RobS of. --Wikinterpreter^{Liaise with the cabal?}

To be honest, I have no idea why this article even needs a picture of Gore other than that he's a noted environmentalist. --Colest 18:54, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

And furthermore, can you explain what any of that has to do with environmentalists? It seems to me if you want to write about Gaia worshipers that should be moved to a different topic. You seem to be looking for the most ridiculous information you can find and trying to stereotype all environmentalists as nut jobs. --Colest 18:54, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

‎