Talk:Essay:Creationist Behavior on Conservapedia

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

TK's complaint about A-8

That is an outright lie, and I have never said that.--Sysop-TK /MyTalk 18:44, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

You did on IRC one night.-AmesGyo! 18:46, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
But, you're right, it's not nice, so I deleted it.-AmesGyo! 18:47, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
  • You do know you are on probation, constantly, right Ames? Your lie about me, on that page, is typical Liberal assassination. Attacking other users, offering false witness and bullying by calling others out, not just Sysops, is a block-able offense. This is your very last warning. Pay attention. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 18:48, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
    • I removed it. Good point.-AmesGyo! 18:49, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Revisionism is a Liberal trait, and doesn't get you out from under on this. The fact that you dared to practice your "big lie" technique, and were caught, made you change it. Otherwise it would have remained in place as that same charge you made against me other places is still there. Please understand my utter sincerity in saying your next block will be the last one. Nothing personal, you understand. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 18:52, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
    • Look, it's true, I just decided it's not nice. You did say that. To me. In IRC. You were like, "yeah, I've stopped contributing." I only deleted it because it hurts the essay to point fingers.-AmesGyo! 18:53, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

I've moved this here because it's between you & me, not Andy.-AmesGyo! 18:55, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

  • Removing something from anyone's user page is a blockable offense, Ames. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 19:00, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

Apologies. Was trying to keep the discussion in the right place.-AmesGyo! 19:01, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

  • I am deciding if I should block you, finally, for the last time, Ames. I never said that to you in IRC or anywhere else. I did once tell you that Sysops, and me specifically, could produce more articles if not from the constant arguements and vandals. That is nothing like you claim to have happened. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 19:04, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

If you strike me down I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine :-). But, I honestly remember that. If I'm wrong, apologies, and since it's deleted, no harm no foul.-AmesGyo! 19:07, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

Great work, yerself ;)

Though I suspect to them it just reads liberal lies liberal lies liberal lies liberal lies liberal lies liberal lies liberal lies liberal lies.... --Robledo 19:23, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

Cites

Great work AmesG, but I think to really get the point across, citations should be added to each point, like in Reginod's dicta. Not only would this make it superior to its counterpoint, but it would also make silly argument much harder to continue. I think I recognise a couple of the events here described ... --Wikinterpretertalk?

Here's one for the first eg. --Wikinterpretertalk?

Response to Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia, point 1

  1. Liberals seem to think nearly everyone else agrees with them, and even seem shocked and offended when they encounter someone who does not. In the United States, conservatives outnumber liberals by a 2:1 ratio, yet most liberals do not recognize that. Ask a liberal, for example, what percentage of people accept the Deluge as recounted in the Bible and the liberal's answer can be off by a factor of ten."

I think a valid reponse would be:

"People who are experts in a given field tend to agree with liberals about issues relating to that field. For example, most doctors agree with liberals regarding medical issues. Most geologists agree with liberals regarding geologic issues. Most biologists (99.84%) agree with liberals regarding evolutionary issues. Populism has no place in science."

What do you think? --Hojimachongtalk 13:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

  • I think you are confusing YEC with Conservative's. That's what I think. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 03:21, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
Confusing YEC with Conservative's what? Auld Nick 03:56, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Not all, not even most people in the US who are "conservative" disagree with science. To say people of science agree more with Liberals than they do with Conservatives is poppycock, wild speculation. Most people of science are apolitical at best, barely cognizant of the political world, except when exploring grants. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 05:36, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
In your previous edit it seems that something is missing at the end of the first sentence. I am still none the wiser as to what. Auld Nick 05:50, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Well, that is a shame. Maybe you can get a friend or loved one to help you? --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 10:46, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
Thank you for the civil answer. I will ask a friend. My, it's a bit like Who Wants to be a MillionaireTM here. All good clean Christian fun. Auld Nick.
Note I said creationist, not conservative, TK. Creationism rarely (if ever) is backed up by Scientific evidence. So it's not as much scientists agreeing with liberals, but rather disagreeing with creationists. --Hojimachongtalk 20:11, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
  • You did? This is what I said was poppycock, pure speculation, and which Auld Nick is confused by:

"People who are experts in a given field tend to agree with liberals about issues relating to that field. For example, most doctors agree with liberals regarding medical issues. Most geologists agree with liberals regarding geologic issues. Most biologists (99.84%) agree with liberals regarding evolutionary issues. Populism has no place in science."

I don't see the word "creationist" anywhere above....--Sysop-TK /MyTalk 20:28, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

I'm not confused by that. I'm confuded by your sentence I think you are confusing YEC with Conservative's, the genetive is used but what it is referring to is missing. Auld Nick 06:16, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Creationist_Behavior_on_Conservapedia&oldid=152836"