Talk:Essay:Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the "tolerant"

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LeonardO (Talk | contribs) at 19:22, 30 June 2011. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Red links

I was thinking that since those liberal vandals listed no longer have user pages or talk pages that instead in linking them (pointless, as the links lead to basically nowhere) we could put them in bold instead??? Just a thought. --AmeliaJ 18:01, 5 January 2009 (EST)

Done. Thanks for the suggestion. --DeanStalk 18:24, 5 January 2009 (EST)

I also agree very much. Great idea. User:AddisonDM 7 January 2009

This page should be deleted.

The very existence of this page encourages vandalism. It becomes a motive for people to commit vandalism. --Tim TalkFormerly CPAdmin1 21:12, 10 January 2009 (EST)

How so? JY23 13:50, 11 January 2009 (EST)
Cause it's funny to read what some people have wrote. It's like reading conversations. JonGTennisu no Boifriendo 19:56, 28 June 2009 (EDT)
In the end, I don't think it matters. It's better if we do get a slight increase in vandalism, and be able to show everyone the utter moronic nature of it, like this essay is meant to do. It is very important that the average reader actually see the kind of junk these vandals post. AddisonDM 20:01, 16 January 2009 (EST)

Colbert vandals

Should we mention something about the recent Colbert-inspired vandalism? --OscarJ 14:19, 11 October 2009 (EDT)


Ok, it's just minor as the abuse and vulgarity could be worse, but maybe you should put a minor warning at the beginning of the article stating that the examples contain profanity and general unpleasantness. Just to be on the safe side :) --Leo-from-UK 15:22, 30 June 2011 (EDT)