Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Non-fiction Books"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
::One of the staffers at the Eagle forum pointed me here, so me being here is me sucking up to Mrs. Schlafly if anything. :D --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 00:41, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::One of the staffers at the Eagle forum pointed me here, so me being here is me sucking up to Mrs. Schlafly if anything. :D --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 00:41, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Ha ha, you're getting two for the price of one then :-) --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 00:42, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Ha ha, you're getting two for the price of one then :-) --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 00:42, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
::::If it's not complementary about Sweden's system, why did you write their system as "good socialism"? No matter what country's using it, socialism is not a good thing. [[User:RSnelik|RSnelik]] 00:45, 22 September 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:45, September 22, 2011

I was thrown off by the fact that someone created the article under my feet. I was further thrown off by the fact that the first two books on the list were the first two books on my version of the list, though I simply listed the bible and gave the full title of the wealth of nations. --DrDean 00:37, 22 September 2011 (EDT)

That's OK; I was just having a dig at you for adding two books by Phyllis Schlafly. I bet you always brought your teacher an apple :-D --SamCoulter 00:38, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
One of the staffers at the Eagle forum pointed me here, so me being here is me sucking up to Mrs. Schlafly if anything. :D --DrDean 00:41, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
Ha ha, you're getting two for the price of one then :-) --SamCoulter 00:42, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
If it's not complementary about Sweden's system, why did you write their system as "good socialism"? No matter what country's using it, socialism is not a good thing. RSnelik 00:45, 22 September 2011 (EDT)