Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Wikipedia's Ads-for-Charity"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: A possible expansion opportunity, or link for another essay is that Wikipedia already, of course, accepts donations - in fact, Wikipedia openly solicits donations. At one point, a banner w...)
 
(possible answer)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A possible expansion opportunity, or link for another essay is that Wikipedia already, of course, accepts donations - in fact, Wikipedia openly solicits donations. At one point, a banner was run at the top of every page asking for donations. Although I have admittedly not kept up with the topic, I do think that the financial accountability is controversial - where is this money going? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 11:48, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
 
A possible expansion opportunity, or link for another essay is that Wikipedia already, of course, accepts donations - in fact, Wikipedia openly solicits donations. At one point, a banner was run at the top of every page asking for donations. Although I have admittedly not kept up with the topic, I do think that the financial accountability is controversial - where is this money going? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 11:48, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
: Um, http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Planned_Spending_Distribution_2007-2008 ? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 12:00, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:00, June 2, 2008

A possible expansion opportunity, or link for another essay is that Wikipedia already, of course, accepts donations - in fact, Wikipedia openly solicits donations. At one point, a banner was run at the top of every page asking for donations. Although I have admittedly not kept up with the topic, I do think that the financial accountability is controversial - where is this money going? DanH 11:48, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Um, http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Planned_Spending_Distribution_2007-2008 ? Wandering 12:00, 2 June 2008 (EDT)