Talk:Essay: Conservapedia obsessive compulsive disorder

Sounds frightening. Is there any known cure? Martyp 21:40, 20 November 2010 (EST)

Thanks for the input. I just added a section to the essay entitled Treatment of Conservapedia obsessive compulsive disorder. conservative 22:20, 20 November 2010 (EST)

lol

I love you people. we need to get you all a tv show.. ratings would be big!! Xoxoxoxo 18:13, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

Should it be noted

That COCD can afflict conservatives as well? If an obsessive compulsion with Conservapedia caused people to read the Bible less, would we censor that? BradB 13:10, 9 August 2011 (EDT)

Dog photos

I love dogs as much as the next guy but having them all over this article both takes away from the point, and makes Conservapedia look a little... childish? Thoughts? JRegden 23:50, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

If you think there is too many dogs on this picture, then you are probably a cat person. And there is nothing childish about dogs. Conservative 02:15, 19 July 2013 (EDT)

Quality control

This should not pass it. This is the lowest quality article I have seen on any wiki. It's an affront to the brilliance of so many other articles on CP. I will ask ASchlafly whether this can be deleted. Any thoughts? Jacob Anderson 23:51, 20 June 2013 (EDT)

Sure. I suggest testing the validity of your purported evolutionary worldview by debating VivaYehshua. The debate will be recorded and distributed widely. Conservative 21:55, 15 July 2013 (EDT)

VivaYeshua got banned from that chatroom. I went looking for him the other day, while I was banned by MarkMan. How about I debate you? Jacob Anderson 08:23, 17 July 2013 (EDT)

Two things: A Conservapedian told me that the report that VivaYehshua, who I believe is still a moderator of Shockofgod's chat room, is a false report. He inquired about this matter in the Shockofgod's chat room. I never believed this false report as VivaYehshua has never been disruptive in the chat room and that is why he was picked as a moderator. Second, please read THIS. Conservative 12:37, 17 July 2013 (EDT)

It isn't an article (thankfully), but rather an "essay" where user:Conservative is free to post his taunts. The rules for essays are more lenient, and thus, according to the commandments, this essay is fine. brenden 13:38, 17 July 2013 (EDT)

Elijah taunted the prophets of Baal. I think Bible believers are free to taunt the proud and often boastful adherents of the religions of atheism, evolutionism and liberalism. Especially, since they foist their religions on the public via taxpayer dollars (public schools, etc.) and practice strong arm tactics to suppress alternative views. See: Evolution is a religion and Atheism is a religion and Suppression of alternatives to evolution

Of course, there is a time and place for everything and lately I have taunted adherents of these religions less frequently. Conservative 15:00, 17 July 2013 (EDT)

Brenden, does that mean I could create an essay page "taunting" Conservative? Jacob Anderson 20:53, 18 July 2013 (EDT)

All of our content is subject to our Commandments. I will not comment on whether User:Conservative's various pages are in compliance with them. GregG 01:21, 19 July 2013 (EDT)

Conservapedia has had a group of people obsessed with the website for about 6 years. Deny this and lose all credibility! :) Conservative 01:50, 19 July 2013 (EDT)

I'm not denying that. But don't you think that you'd be better off improving articles in the main space, like the articles Formula One and 2012 Summer Olympics that desperately need updating and rewriting? You are thriving off of the attention that a few others give you, and so taunting them and being similarly obsessed with them makes you no greater than them. Jacob Anderson 09:06, 19 July 2013 (EDT)