Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Darwin fish meet the Question evolution! campaign"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
MaxFletcher (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
"To be certain to take what you attack, attack where the enemy cannot defend." - Sun Tzu [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:57, 30 November 2011 (EST) | "To be certain to take what you attack, attack where the enemy cannot defend." - Sun Tzu [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:57, 30 November 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | ::So this is the best animation you have? You know, if this campaign is to work you need to have a certain amount of polish to it. It needs to be professional, slick and credible. The animation is none of this and, actually, looks stupid. So what image to you want to portray - one of professionalism or one that is amateur? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:00, 30 November 2011 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:00, November 30, 2011
This animation is really really bad. Can't you find a better one? MaxFletcher 15:13, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Don't worry, it appears given the expanding volunteer base of a certain group, soon there will be animations/essays using piranha or schools of sharks. :) Conservative 15:23, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- OK, but in the meantime this animation is terrible. It looks bad and moves even worse. Not a good image. MaxFletcher 15:29, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Why don't you ask Shockofgod if he likes it. :) Conservative 15:32, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- is it physically painful for you to respond like a normal human being? The animation is embarrassing and very amateur which makes your campaign look the same. Do you know anything about marketing? MaxFletcher 15:34, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Max, the evolutionist goal is poorly defended in the biology class stadiums and this is yet another case where biblical Christians are going to slam goal after goal in the atheist/naturalism net. It is going to be glorious! Conservative 15:44, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- That's great. Now about this animation - it looks terribly amateur, is there another one you could use that looks more professional? MaxFletcher 15:50, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Max, the evolutionist goal is poorly defended in the biology class stadiums and this is yet another case where biblical Christians are going to slam goal after goal in the atheist/naturalism net. It is going to be glorious! Conservative 15:44, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- is it physically painful for you to respond like a normal human being? The animation is embarrassing and very amateur which makes your campaign look the same. Do you know anything about marketing? MaxFletcher 15:34, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Why don't you ask Shockofgod if he likes it. :) Conservative 15:32, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- OK, but in the meantime this animation is terrible. It looks bad and moves even worse. Not a good image. MaxFletcher 15:29, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Don't worry, it appears given the expanding volunteer base of a certain group, soon there will be animations/essays using piranha or schools of sharks. :) Conservative 15:23, 30 November 2011 (EST)
In 2011, the results of a study was published indicating that most United States high school biology teachers are reluctant to endorse the theory of evolution in class. Just imagine how timid teachers will be when students are armed with the 15 questions plus any follow up questions that are developed!
"To be certain to take what you attack, attack where the enemy cannot defend." - Sun Tzu Conservative 15:57, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- So this is the best animation you have? You know, if this campaign is to work you need to have a certain amount of polish to it. It needs to be professional, slick and credible. The animation is none of this and, actually, looks stupid. So what image to you want to portray - one of professionalism or one that is amateur? MaxFletcher 16:00, 30 November 2011 (EST)
