Difference between revisions of "Talk:Feminist style"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 496820 by MacLeod123 (Talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
== Title ==  
+
==Sense of Humor==
 +
I find it ironic that this article states that feminists do not have a sense of humor.  A lot of my fellow conservatives have no sense of humor whatsoever (which is why the 1/2 hour news hour was a welcome attempt, even if it didn't quite hit the mark).  Anyway, this statement is not cited, and sounds like someone's opinion.  I would like to remove it, as this is an encyclopedia.
  
 +
== Title ==
 
Depsite the fact this article is pathetic (I'm no fan of feminists but really..)I think it Feminist Style sounds awkward. Perhaps 'Characteristics' is a better title.
 
Depsite the fact this article is pathetic (I'm no fan of feminists but really..)I think it Feminist Style sounds awkward. Perhaps 'Characteristics' is a better title.
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 01:46, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 01:46, 15 April 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:32, 6 September 2009

Sense of Humor

I find it ironic that this article states that feminists do not have a sense of humor. A lot of my fellow conservatives have no sense of humor whatsoever (which is why the 1/2 hour news hour was a welcome attempt, even if it didn't quite hit the mark). Anyway, this statement is not cited, and sounds like someone's opinion. I would like to remove it, as this is an encyclopedia.

Title

Depsite the fact this article is pathetic (I'm no fan of feminists but really..)I think it Feminist Style sounds awkward. Perhaps 'Characteristics' is a better title. AdenJ 01:46, 15 April 2008 (EDT)

Sexual harassment

Please, please, please tell me that the "think sexual harassment is a bad thing" is a vandal strike, or something. Are you telling me there's people out there who believe sexual harassment is a good thing? And that feminists are the only ones who believe it's bad?Raggs 07:12, 15 April 2008 (EDT)