Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fox News"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
I would think that it would be more appropriately said as "Fox News claims to be fair and balanced," or something along those lines.
 
I would think that it would be more appropriately said as "Fox News claims to be fair and balanced," or something along those lines.
 
Anyone disagree?
 
Anyone disagree?
[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 15:23, 7 March 2007 (EST)
+
--[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 15:23, 7 March 2007 (EST)
  
 
I think this entire article could use an overhaul.  Although I am a supporter of Fox News, the bias in this article in very apparent.  --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 15:25, 7 March 2007 (EST)
 
I think this entire article could use an overhaul.  Although I am a supporter of Fox News, the bias in this article in very apparent.  --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 15:25, 7 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
True.  Didn't even notice the "Sean Hannity is a great American" statement at first, which I think is safe to say is an opinion.  Also, the reference points to an outdated car giveaway. Doesn't seem like it belongs.
 +
--[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 15:42, 7 March 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 14:42, 7 March 2007

Is a citation from Fox News saying that Fox News is fair and balanced really a good idea? I would think that it would be more appropriately said as "Fox News claims to be fair and balanced," or something along those lines. Anyone disagree? --Commodore Guff 15:23, 7 March 2007 (EST)

I think this entire article could use an overhaul. Although I am a supporter of Fox News, the bias in this article in very apparent. --<<-David R->> 15:25, 7 March 2007 (EST)

True. Didn't even notice the "Sean Hannity is a great American" statement at first, which I think is safe to say is an opinion. Also, the reference points to an outdated car giveaway. Doesn't seem like it belongs. --Commodore Guff 15:42, 7 March 2007 (EST)