Difference between revisions of "Talk:Freedom of the press"
From Conservapedia
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nice additions you made. [[User:Wschact]]. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 08:31, 8 January 2015 (EST) | Nice additions you made. [[User:Wschact]]. [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 08:31, 8 January 2015 (EST) | ||
| − | Dear [[User:Wschact]], I do not see why you keep removing my edits. I ''''integrated'''' your edits and you deleted mine each time. Not OK. Think about it please and discuss. Please do not start "Revert wars". | + | Dear [[User:Wschact]], I do not see why you keep removing my edits. I ''''integrated'''' your edits and you deleted mine each time. Not OK. Think about it please and discuss here. Please do not start "Revert wars". |
You really don't like the line that you keep deleting that says, "It has no precedent in earlier [[history]] and remains, to this day, a uniquely [[American]] phenomenon." Perhaps you are not from America? That would make sense. | You really don't like the line that you keep deleting that says, "It has no precedent in earlier [[history]] and remains, to this day, a uniquely [[American]] phenomenon." Perhaps you are not from America? That would make sense. | ||
[[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 13:27, 8 January 2015 (EST) | [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 13:27, 8 January 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | :(ec) I integrated your edits as well. The United States was not the first country with freedom of the press. Norway had it first, but later lost it. It is not an unalienable right, although reasonable people would want it for their society. Your "see also" sections generally do not meet Conservapedia style, and I believe the important ideas are already linked in the text. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 13:39, 8 January 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Corrected it. I strongly disagree that in your words my "see also sections generally do not meet Conservapedia style" that you personally recently wrote into the formerly unwritten See Also standards. I can actually find more than 500 articles (and have see them already in my perusing of CP) that I have not edited that follow those very same See Also standards that I did on the page. What is your specific problem with them? You really seem to be going to far. Thanks. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See Also== | ||
| + | * [[Unalienable rights|Unalienable]] [[First Amendment]] of the [[Bill of Rights]] | ||
| + | ** Freedom of the press | ||
| + | ** [[Free speech]] | ||
| + | ** [[Free Speech Clause]] | ||
| + | * [[Constitution First Amendment Press Association]] | ||
| + | * [[Journalistic malpractice]] | ||
| + | * [[Essay:Journalism and patriotism|Journalism and patriotism]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] 13:43, 8 January 2015 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:50, January 8, 2015
Nice additions you made. User:Wschact. TheAmericanRedoubt 08:31, 8 January 2015 (EST)
Dear User:Wschact, I do not see why you keep removing my edits. I 'integrated' your edits and you deleted mine each time. Not OK. Think about it please and discuss here. Please do not start "Revert wars".
You really don't like the line that you keep deleting that says, "It has no precedent in earlier history and remains, to this day, a uniquely American phenomenon." Perhaps you are not from America? That would make sense.
TheAmericanRedoubt 13:27, 8 January 2015 (EST)
- (ec) I integrated your edits as well. The United States was not the first country with freedom of the press. Norway had it first, but later lost it. It is not an unalienable right, although reasonable people would want it for their society. Your "see also" sections generally do not meet Conservapedia style, and I believe the important ideas are already linked in the text. Thanks, Wschact 13:39, 8 January 2015 (EST)
- Corrected it. I strongly disagree that in your words my "see also sections generally do not meet Conservapedia style" that you personally recently wrote into the formerly unwritten See Also standards. I can actually find more than 500 articles (and have see them already in my perusing of CP) that I have not edited that follow those very same See Also standards that I did on the page. What is your specific problem with them? You really seem to be going to far. Thanks.
See Also
- Unalienable First Amendment of the Bill of Rights
- Freedom of the press
- Free speech
- Free Speech Clause
- Constitution First Amendment Press Association
- Journalistic malpractice
- Journalism and patriotism
TheAmericanRedoubt 13:43, 8 January 2015 (EST)
