Difference between revisions of "Talk:Geologic system"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:Geological column moved to Talk:Geologic system: More neutral name)
(fooey)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:Scratch that; I've decided on a different name altogether.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:48, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Scratch that; I've decided on a different name altogether.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:48, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Me too, but due to the Kommandments, I can't print it here.  This article is just garbage.  Although the hilarious, obligatory YEC (why isn't this called YECapedia?) "perspective" is, I guess, par for the course, where is the ''article''?  What do we learn when we read this?  Almost nothing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:21, 28 April 2007

Article name

Any opinions on which is the correct (or better) name?

  • Google has 53,900 hits on English pages for "Geologic Column".
  • Google has 24,600 hits on English pages for "Geological Column" (the present title).

Philip J. Rayment 05:44, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

Scratch that; I've decided on a different name altogether. Philip J. Rayment 05:48, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
Me too, but due to the Kommandments, I can't print it here. This article is just garbage. Although the hilarious, obligatory YEC (why isn't this called YECapedia?) "perspective" is, I guess, par for the course, where is the article? What do we learn when we read this? Almost nothing. Human 21:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)