Difference between revisions of "Talk:Godwin's law"
From Conservapedia
m (Talk:Godwin's law moved to Talk:Godwin's Law) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is some credibility behind Godwin's law, so I'll leave it alone.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT) | There is some credibility behind Godwin's law, so I'll leave it alone.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | Is this a real "law"? It seems like a thinly veiled attack on our evolution articles. I move for its deletion. --[[User:DReynolds|DReynolds]] 16:30, 17 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:30, January 17, 2009
There is some credibility behind Godwin's law, so I'll leave it alone.--Elamdri 03:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT) Is this a real "law"? It seems like a thinly veiled attack on our evolution articles. I move for its deletion. --DReynolds 16:30, 17 January 2009 (EST)
