Difference between revisions of "Talk:Godwin's law"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
There is some credibility behind Godwin's law, so I'll leave it alone.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 
There is some credibility behind Godwin's law, so I'll leave it alone.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 03:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
Is this a real "law"? It seems like a thinly veiled attack on our evolution articles. I move for its deletion. --[[User:DReynolds|DReynolds]] 16:30, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 16:30, 17 January 2009

There is some credibility behind Godwin's law, so I'll leave it alone.--Elamdri 03:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT) Is this a real "law"? It seems like a thinly veiled attack on our evolution articles. I move for its deletion. --DReynolds 16:30, 17 January 2009 (EST)