Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ground Ball"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(one page for baseball terms?)
 
(good idea!)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Can I suggest combining all the terms onto a single page?  Extremely short glossary-type entries like this and other entries in the template below don't really merit their own article.--[[User_talk:Recorder|Recorder]] 19:12, 13 February 2008 (EST)
 
Can I suggest combining all the terms onto a single page?  Extremely short glossary-type entries like this and other entries in the template below don't really merit their own article.--[[User_talk:Recorder|Recorder]] 19:12, 13 February 2008 (EST)
 +
:A baseball glossary? That's a good idea. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:19, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 18:19, 13 February 2008

Can I suggest combining all the terms onto a single page? Extremely short glossary-type entries like this and other entries in the template below don't really merit their own article.--Recorder 19:12, 13 February 2008 (EST)

A baseball glossary? That's a good idea. DanH 19:19, 13 February 2008 (EST)