Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hand"
From Conservapedia
Jeremiah4-22 (Talk | contribs) (New page: Perhaps a more anatomy-orientated article might be better here? --~~~~) |
NotALiberal (Talk | contribs) (→"One of God's most amazing creations": new section) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Perhaps a more anatomy-orientated article might be better here? --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 12:10, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | + | Perhaps a more anatomy-orientated article might be better here? --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 12:10, 8 April 2007 (EDT |
| + | |||
| + | Very silly article...rewrite needed. Is there even a need for an article on hands?--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 12:14, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've added an anatomy section which at least lays out the basics, but it's severely lacking. Better than before though. --[[User:JHill|JHill]] 18:03, 28 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "One of God's most amazing creations" == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sounds like something from a childrens book, the entire opening paragraph sounds unencyclopedic. [[User:NotALiberal|NotALiberal]] 23:24, 1 February 2009 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:24, February 2, 2009
Perhaps a more anatomy-orientated article might be better here? --Jeremiah4-22 12:10, 8 April 2007 (EDT
Very silly article...rewrite needed. Is there even a need for an article on hands?--PalMDtalk 12:14, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
I've added an anatomy section which at least lays out the basics, but it's severely lacking. Better than before though. --JHill 18:03, 28 December 2008 (EST)
"One of God's most amazing creations"
Sounds like something from a childrens book, the entire opening paragraph sounds unencyclopedic. NotALiberal 23:24, 1 February 2009 (EST)
