Difference between revisions of "Talk:Historicity of Jesus"

Revision as of 12:46, May 22, 2007

I like this bit:

Hence, there is simply no debate amongst historians on the matter. In other words, for someone to argue that Jesus never existed (and thus is merely a myth) is to place himself against not only the field of scholarship and the historical record, but even against reason and common sense.

I wonder what would happen if I were to swap the word Jesus for evolution and historians/historical for scientists/geological then place the text at the top of the article Theory of evolution? Auld Nick 08:46, 22 May 2007 (EDT)