Talk:Huffington Post

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Philcooper81 (Talk | contribs) at 22:38, 22 October 2019. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Hmm...Conservapedia accuses The Huffington Post of delivering "one sided news". Isn't Conservapedia kind of one sided? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Acwellman (talk)

Well, do you know what point of view Conservapedia stands for? Nothing in the title of the Huffinpuffin Post tells me they are liberal. Maybe it's because of deceit that they hide behind objectivity when in fact liberal.--Jpatt 12:00, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
At least Conservapedia admits its POV, proudly proclaims it, Acwellman. We don't offer ours under the cloud of deceit that the HuffPo uses. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 12:42, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

I'm not a big fan of The Huffington Post, of course, but isn't saying that it's "often referred to as a hate site" a little much without any citation to back it up? It's liberal claptrap and essentially a media organ of the democrat party, to be sure, but I wouldn't deem it a hate site. WallyRyan 17:19, 20 April 2011 (EDT)

Well, the external links section calls Huffington a hate site so that seems like a good citation to me. --Jpatt 21:40, 20 April 2011 (EDT)

Thanks, I missed that. They're both blogs, but it seems to me that blogs are a better medium of the people than the mainstream media, so its valid. Ironic, though, considering that the Huffington Post prides itself partly on its blogs... WallyRyan 00:21, 21 April 2011 (EDT)

The company rebranded from "The Huffington Post" to "HuffPost" in 2017. Accordingly, the article and its talk page should be moved, with "The Huffington Post" becoming a redirect to "HuffPost". — Philcooper81T 18:38, 22 October 2019 (EDT)