Difference between revisions of "Talk:Intelligent design"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
([http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy)
([http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. [[User:Celigans|Celigans]] 03:03, 10 April 2011 (EDT)
 
The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. [[User:Celigans|Celigans]] 03:03, 10 April 2011 (EDT)
 +
:Atheism is also a logical fallacy; atheists think since there is no evidence against atheism that it must be true. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 07:31, 10 April 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:31, April 10, 2011

! This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Conservlogo.png
! Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism.
Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop.
Conservlogo.png
Talk:Intelligent design/Archive-1

More evidence of intelligent design

I would add this article giving more evidence of an intelligent designer at work. Martyp 11:05, 30 January 2011 (EST)

[1] is a logical fallacy

The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. Celigans 03:03, 10 April 2011 (EDT)

Atheism is also a logical fallacy; atheists think since there is no evidence against atheism that it must be true. DMorris 07:31, 10 April 2011 (EDT)