Difference between revisions of "Talk:Labour Party"
(→Labour Party, socialists or not?) |
(Title) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Anyway, where does it describe them as socialist on their website?[[User:Sitedrm|Sitedrm]] 14:37, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | Anyway, where does it describe them as socialist on their website?[[User:Sitedrm|Sitedrm]] 14:37, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Title == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Shouldn't this be located at a more appropriate title given the numerous parties around the world with the name? I know how fond Conservapedians are of Wikipedia, but just [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_Party as a comparison]... Thought I'd throw that out there. I doubt [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_Party_%28Netherlands%29 the one whose page I was looking for] would merit much interest here anyway. :) [[User:Punuma|Punuma]] 19:03, 6 October 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 23:03, October 6, 2007
Labour Party, socialists or not?
Yes. Their party website decribes them as being a socialist party.
No. Fidel Castro describes Cuba as being a democracy - what the leader says doesn't make it so! Labour has pursued Third Way social-democratic policies since 1997, and during their time in power they have significantly shifted to the right. --Rafa 18:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Anyway, where does it describe them as socialist on their website?Sitedrm 14:37, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Title
Shouldn't this be located at a more appropriate title given the numerous parties around the world with the name? I know how fond Conservapedians are of Wikipedia, but just as a comparison... Thought I'd throw that out there. I doubt the one whose page I was looking for would merit much interest here anyway. :) Punuma 19:03, 6 October 2007 (EDT)